From Theodore Mawe in Goroka
I was very much impressed by an article entitled ‘Recognise Aussie Kiaps’ by Ilya Gridneff of AAP which appeared in the ‘The National’ dated 31 October 2008. A Mr Viner-Smith, a former patrol officer expressed his concern for the neglected recognition given by Australia for the efforts and hardships kiaps and patrol officers endured in bringing law and order and development services to the remote peoples of PNG. He expressed his views by comparing the recognition Kokoda war veterans get as opposed to themselves who are never recognized. He says they endured all the hardships, sufferings and risks of encounter with an alien world and thinks they should be respected and given some kind of recognition as the Kokoda war veterans.
The writer states that the Australian government will be asked to honour the pioneering work of Australian patrol officers who brought development to Papua New Guinea’s tribes between 1949 and 1974. He says that after WW11 and before PNG Independence in 1975, more than 8,000 Australian public servants administered PNG as an external Australian territory. Among those administrators, 2,500 were kiaps or patrol officers [who endured hardships and risked their lives] to bring development to PNG. Mr. Chris Viner-Smith, a former kiap or patrol officer is quoted as saying,” their efforts are part of a forgotten Australian history that was never officially recognized”. He says,” kiaps brought law and order to PNG’s remote tribal areas and paved way for Australian teachers, agricultural officers and infrastructure and health personnel to go and work for the first time”.
“The work of kiaps formed a glorious chapter in Australia's history just as the Kokoda campaign has. And both share the remarkable heritage of being Australian and shaping a new future for PNG. I don’t know why we’ve been forgotten,” said Mr Viner-Smith as per quoted by the writer.
The jobs kiaps carried out was not easy. The writer I quote says, “ the work of the kiaps was to trek isolated [and some unknown ] villages to conduct weeks and months of surveys while also providing basic services like law and order”. Mr Viner-Smith is quoted as saying and which depicts a typical scene, “ my first task was to get 40 prisoners to build an airstrip in a swamp. Imagine that as a 21 year old in PNG in 1961, when there were no roads, no radios, no support.”
“You just had to survive or you would die”. It was not the people, it was the country itself, it was an alien land full of danger”, said Mr Viner-Smith as per quoted by the writer. Here we can imagine the dangers prevalent during those times; in the highlands there could have been prevalance of warfare, fast-flowing rivers and steep mountains; and in the lowlands illness from malaria, snake bites, deep swamps and rivers pested with crocodiles. These sort of environment would not have been favourable and would be seen as dangerous for our pioneer administrators or kiaps.
I sympathise and support Mr Viner-Smith, just as others are doing in Australia. The writer quotes Mr Viner-Smith who said,”he had support from politicians, the PNG Association of Australia, the ex-kiap network and the police federation. And at least they have got the acknowledgement they deserve”. The writer concludes and I quote, “ The parliamentary secretary of Pacific Islands Affairs Duncan Kerr said the submission [ for the recognition of Aussie kiaps] would be viewed seriously as kiaps were an integral part of the Australian colonial administration in PNG”.
I support the movement here not in the sense that I am party to it but as someone who values history and have great concern over especially for the destruction and loss of colonial buildings and property. What are colonial buildings and property? These are things like , for example in Mendi; the former residential house of the first District Commissioner; there is a mountain named after him namely Mr Clancy; there are other old houses which were formerly used by Mr Clancy’s officers; the site of first european settlement which is marked by an erected stone monument on which is a plaque that reads this historical event well and the site of first missionary settlement and buildings.
I feel that these colonial buildings and sites located throughout the country should be preserved and studies on these things be carried out and publications related to these produced. And we may question why bother doing these things when we should be worried about economic things the most. Well here is my opinion. The kiaps whose efforts we now enjoy should be given the recognition they deserve when they are calling out loud for it. The only way PNG can compensate and honor them is by restoring, conserving, preserving and maintaining the actual objects and writing about their achievements in the form of publications.
The kiaps as well as PNG can benefit from doing this. The kiaps can participate in writing their reports and publish these and make money from it. They can also benefit in the sense that they and their descendants can read of their achievements in publication. The other way in which kiaps can benefit is when their descendants visit the sites and see the actual things for themselves and have an appreciation for it.
And for PNG it can benefit in terms of tourism and historical education. The colonial and historic buildings and sites can serve very well as important tourist attractions to generate revenue for PNG. In places like Australia and New Zealand historic buildings, sites and places have served very well as important tourist attractions and have generated much needed revenue. The same can be true in PNG when we develop these things and attract tourists including the former kiaps and their descendants who would visit these sites during their vacation and or holidays. Generally tourism will save PNG when its non-renewable resources like oil, gas and gold run out and when we need to make up for lost income. And the teaching of these things in schools, colleges and universities will benefit our young generation.
An institution to cater for the work of carrying out studies as well as to coordinate the restoration, conservation, and preservation of colonial buildings and sites should be established. Australia in partnership or otherwise with PNG should, if not fund an organisation which will initiate plans to develop and manage a program which will be responsible for the restoration, preservation and conservation of colonial and historical heritage property. I would recommend that this be initially an NGO rather than a government body which have less transparency credibility, and I make note of a certain media publicity concerning the miss-use of funds raised to restore the old parliament house by a certain government agency. The aim of this body will be to reconstruct and preserve damaged buildings and property, conserve sites, and carry out studies related with these and produce publications.
The writer is Theodore Mawe of the University of Goroka, Goroka. His contact is email [email protected] and phone 7311796