Kiap system was dismantled too quickly
28 February 2011
BY NORM RICHARDSON
DR ROY SCRAGG [Attitude, 26 February] is, I suspect, simply stirring for the sake of stirring in saying "Kiaps never prepared for the change that mattered" in PNG, that is the attainment of national independence in 1975.
As Director of Health, Dr Scragg always seemed happy to have Kiaps help build aid posts, hospitals and the roads needed to connect them with the villages.
There was a rush to convert the public service of the newly independent nation from a colonial style to a metropolitan style in 1975, encouraged by first Andrew Peacock and then by Gough Whitlam, as I recall.
That meant that there would no longer be a place for a generalist public servant with very wide powers, as the nature of the new work of government would (theoretically) need specialists with narrow powers and training, who were easier to train and would demand lower pay rates.
Professor Hal Colebatch made a long study of the Kiap system in TPNG and came to the conclusion that it was the only effective method of administering the country, until it became a replica of the former colonial power, with a settled economy, established service delivery, a unified social structure and easy access to the protection of the legal system for all persons.
As both Paul Oates and Michael Somare have observed, the Kiap system was dismantled far too quickly without being able to integrate PNG nationals fast enough to be effective.
History is being repeated in PNG because those who made critical decisions in the 1950's, 1960's and 1970's did not pay attention to what had already happened to the colonies that were shed post the World War I and World War II.
Consider the way that India and Pakistan suffered post partition as well as the former African colonies and Indonesia.
"Constructive engagement with rural folk". Exactly right. And if we link that to today's rhetoric of 'development corridors' with a focus on economic drivers, you're really talking about smallholder agriculture or village landholder based agricultural systems.
The 'didiman' and the 'kiap' are two of the most revered figures in PNG recent history. Ask your bubu's if their memory goes back that far, or indeed if they are still with you and they'll certainly offer you a fond anecdote.
Posted by: Icarus | 28 February 2011 at 10:52 AM
Norm Richardson is absolutely correct. His third last paragraph says it all: "... the Kiap system was dismantled far too quickly without being able to integrate PNG nationals fast enough to be effective".
Even after 1975, some 20 years later, the new breed PNG public servants are reluctant to venture deep into rural areas where the Kiaps dared to go.
They tend to use four-wheel-drive vehicles rather than move on foot to make regular visits to villages for fear of "something out there".
Along with politicians, they prefer to fly in and out of remote villages by helicopter for so-called 'ground-breaking' ceremonies.
After an hour speaking to a confused gathering of villagers, they fly back to their comfort zones in town.
The government must look again at the, system of district administration, especially at local district level.
Today's public servants needs to learn from the Kiaps, and adopt some of their effective ways of constructive engagement with rural folk.
Posted by: Reginald Renagi | 28 February 2011 at 09:13 AM