Jeannette Leahy, matriarch of Zenag, dies in Sydney
Diggers look back on New Britain WW2 ordeal

Rimbunan Hijau sues Post-Courier for defamation

THE RIMBUNAN HIJAU company is suing the Post-Courier newspaper for defamation in relation to comments published on the Pomio land situation involving an RH subsidiary, the logging company Gilford Ltd.

A writ of summons has been served on the Post-Courier naming South Pacific Post Ltd as the first defendant and reporter John Pangkatana as second defendant.

Warner Shand Lawyers issued a press statement on Thursday saying:

“We act for Rimbunan Hijau Group … we have issued procee­dings for defamation against the Post-Courier for the continuous publication of a statement that the RH Group was in contempt of a court order in relation to the operations at the oil palm project in the Pomio district.

“The purpose of this letter is a similar complaint about the article by Grace Tiden on the front page of the Post-Courier yesterday titled “SABL leases flawed – Women shocked, all agreements defective”.

“We say that the headline is manifestly wrong, presumptive and sub-judice. It is an invention. Nowhere in the report (pages 1 and 5) is there any finding by the commission as to the fact that the SABL is flawed.

“The Commission of Inquiry is still proceeding and has not concluded yet. However, the Post-Courier has chosen to make a finding on its own pre-empting the Commission of Inquiry and the defamation proceedings before the court.

“The Post-Courier has never let the process of the Commission of Inquiry into SABL to take its normal course of event.

“In this regard, the Post-Courier has published more than 15 headlines similarly pre-empting the process of the inquiry and the litigation before the court. There has never been any court order restraining the oil palm project in the Pomio district.

“The Post-Courier, how­ever, has continuously made an allegation that there is such a court order and in this regard a defamation proceeding has been served on the Post-Courier on Tuesday (Nov 8).

“In this case, we note that the Post-Courier was defen­ded by Blake Dawson Lawyers but we are now advised that they are no longer acting.

“What does this mean? Has no other lawyers been appointed? Does it mean that the Post-Courier are acting for themselves or indeed that they have conceded?

“The Post-Courier has subjected the Rimbunan Hijau Group to a trial by media before the court of public opinion. There are a total of about five million hectares of land that are currently alienated under a study undertaken by a professor from the Australian National University.

“The Pomio project is only about 60,000 hectares. Why is Gilford, a subsidiary of Rimbunan Hijau being targeted?

“It is a question that can only be answered by Post-Courier.”

Source: The National, 11 November


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Gapsy Selkambang

Post-Courier, you're too good. You'll prevail.

Phil Fitzpatrick

Hang in there Post Courier.

The truth will out and justice will prevail.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)