‘Mass fury’ warning if O’Neill breaks pledges
PNG elections: fraud, malpractice & shotguns

The circus that is the O’Namah government

TAVURVUR
THE GARAMUT

LAST WEEK PAPUA NEW GUINEA EXPERIENCED a political week from hell, and Tuesday's protest against the deferment of the 2012 general elections and the implementation of the Judicial Conduct Act 2012 was a visibly emphatic and clear message to Peter O’Neill as to how the people of PNG feel about his government’s actions.

The actions and decisions of what we call the O’Namah coalition has shown up Peter O’Neill as a man whose promises can no longer be totally believed in – rather, any commitment he makes must be taken with a grain of salt and be received tentatively, with one eye on the future and the other on the past.

This class of government within the PNG political-context cannot last long.

There are already signs emerging that there is significant internal conflict within the O’Namah coalition – the crux of the concerns swept under the rug being centered around controversial deputy prime minister and leader of key coalition partner PNG Party, Belden Namah.

As I’ve written before, Peter O’Neill’s days as prime minister are numbered.

Belden Namah, along with parliamentary Speaker Jeffery Nape, were the first members of parliament to publicly voice their support to defer the elections.

Hence Namah is viewed by many as being the key principal behind parliament’s initial decision to defer the general elections by six months.

Reviewing O’Namah’s term in government since 2 August 2011, it is quite clear that Belden Namah has remained a constant menace to his government’s stability and the biggest threat to its success.

So why has Peter O’Neill put up with his ignoramus deputy?

It is my view that the pressing requirement to be in government leading up to elections has compromised the substance of O’Neill’s government.

In other words, O’Neill is reluctant to rein-in, discipline or remove Belden Namah as deputy prime minister (despite significant transgressions that warrant some form of political discipline) because the risk of losing control of the government is one which he would rather not entertain.

It is politically expedient for Peter O’Neill to put up with Namah’s antics and hope that the worst has already happened.

Sadly, this has brought O’Neill’s integrity and reputation into question, and it has also highlighted the leadership woes plaguing the current government, or I should say the apparent lack of leadership.

O’Neill seems willing to accept mediocrity for the advantageous position of being in government for the elections.

Nothing illustrates Peter O’Neill’s lack of control within his coalition government better than parliament decision to defer elections by six months.

Peter O’Neill took part in that vote which passed the House 63-11 following a 90-minute debate. He stood and voted for the suspension, but did not address parliament.

Parliament also voted to order electoral commissioner Andrew Trawen to ask Governor-General Sir Michael Ogio for the suspension.

Two days later O’Neill had done a complete backflip stating that, instead of a six month deferral, he wanted an early election because he believd that “parliament was not fully briefed on the status of the preparations of the elections by the chief electoral commissioner”.

He also stated that the initial motion was not approved by the NEC prior to its tabling.

Then when addressing the multitude of protesters at Sir John Guise stadium on Tuesday, O’Neill stated that “parliament does not have the power to direct the electoral commissioner [and that] parliament will not interfere with the electoral commissioner”.

This contradictory habit, which has proven to be endemic within the O’Namah experiment, has severely brought into disrepute the credibility of this government to handle the affairs of the nation.

Furthermore, the symptoms of this political circus have manifested in the top echelons of PNG politics for the world to see – with Peter O’Neill’s repeated indecisiveness also bringing into question his leadership as prime minister.

It is becoming more clear that O’Neill has a weak grasp on his coalition and that he is being driven and directed, beyond his control or sphere of influence, to take part in actions which he may not agree with or even be aware of.

In addition, those once credible leaders who decided to switch sides have now been made to look like fools and at least complicit in the political circus that has engulfed PNG.

Ironically, the only thing for certain now is that the O’Namah Government will do as many backflips, juggling and disappearing acts as required, despite their displeasure of each other, to allow themselves to remain in power for the elections – not for the people of PNG, but for their own personal interests.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Phil Fitzpatrick

In the meantime, if the provincial governors got together and formed a voting bloc they could operate as a defacto senate or at least a third force.

They might even manage the balance of power in the house.

Bob Danaya has just jumped ship. Perhaps people in the provinces should put pressure on their governors to do the same.

Peter Kranz

You could also have computer-based voting - provided this is secure and transparent and audited.

Most LLG government offices have networked computer systems. Citizens could have some proof of identity, turn up at their LLG office and cast a vote electronically.

Less open to abuse than manual voting, and a system could be designed to be secure enough to avoid tampering.

Tavurvur

When the latest political twist occurred, I suggested on Twitter that a dual-tier parliamentary system could help to address the current power-imbalance we see in PNG politics.

I'm glad the idea has also been recognised by other observers too - this means that people are proactively thinking about how we can improve the situation in PNG.

Very encouraging.

A dual-tier parliamentary framework can operate in so many different ways. There are lots of possibilities.

I think one of the key issues here though is that the current system has allowed itself to be compromised.

This is quite concerning and as a Papua New Guinean witnessing these past events, I have lost faith in our systems of checks and balances.

That is why a system like the Senate should be explored.

Clyde Willis

I agree, a Senate would help to stabilise and refine the Acts or Laws which get passed instead of them being half baked, they will be much more thought and debated through and not simply rubber stamp not fully ready drafts.

Agree maybe that's where women's reps can be too, rather than in House of Representatives. Governors of each province should also automatically be on Senate.

Also consider that Regional Governance could be established, so PNG will have 4 or 5 Regions depends how you figure Bougainville.

Many governemnt departments, churches and businesses etc all have regional accounting and marketing offices.

Give some powers to Governors of each Region, some brought down from National and some brought up from Province and allow them functions ie of Audit etc to cover Regional issues.

Give some clout to the Governors of each PNG Region to deal with Authority of their issues. I consider this and a Senate will be good for PNG.

I disagree that the Senate would elect the GG, that rather that something like Fiji, an Association of Chiefs might be a better vehicle, since PNG has come from a Chieftain system in the past, and could be good in some ways to bring vitality back to part of that heritage.

It brought better order moreso than some parts of our modern system which has anarchy happening all too often.

Maybe something like this can help to balance things from another angle too. Some more ideas for the thinking pot and good debate to carry on with. Over.

Yana

I think a survey should be conducted to gauge views of the public on the current issues.

Don't think you are speaking on behave of others.

I personally think our judges are also acting chidishly.

Peter Kranz

Hey this is fun!

Perhaps the Senate could elect one of their members to become the Governor General (maybe in the future, the President of PNG), thus making it completely non-party-political.

A sort of democratic version of Plato's Philosopher-King.

Hell - on this model, Martyn could end up being the first President of PNG!

Peter Kranz

Well one option would be for Senators to represent each province (rather than a specific electorate).

Say two senators from each giving a small Senate of around 40. A bill would need to be passed by both houses to become law.

Perhaps the only people to be elgible for Senate elections could be non-party political great and good who have demonstrated a history of excellent civic service (like Paulius Matane, our friend Reg, Russell Soaba, Dame Meg).

This should recongise accomplishments across all area of PNG life - eg artists, religious leaders, scientists, writers etc.

Perhaps a pool of such talented people could be elected by all on the roll before the actual Senate elections - a bit like the US Primaries.

Plus of course equal numbers of women and men.

Just a thought.

Peter Aimos

I doubt it Peter, but you have raised a very valid point nonetheless! Is it too late to perhaps review our National Constitution and make allowances for an 'Upper House' as you suggested. Any legal eagle out there who could shed some light on this?

Peter Kranz

When the PNG Constitution was being agreed, was any consideration given to having an Upper House (Senate)?

This might have prevented some of the recent nonsense by acting as a brake on Government knee-jerk decision making.

Mrs Barbara Short

Thanks Tavurvur for this clear analysis of what has gone on in the government over the past few weeks.

It will be interesting to see if any of them get re-elected. It is just a pity that the foolish ones have tarnished the reputations of the better men.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)