Canadian Mounties investigate Bougainville corruption allegations
The words of her children inspired prize-winning poet to write

Bored with 'old' Australian politics? Look to Papua New Guinea

SEAN JACOBS | On Line Opinion

YOUNG AUSTRALIANS, IT SEEMS, are disenchanted with 'traditional' politics. They increasingly don't like voting, are sceptical about democracy and prefer to be involved in political causes through social media rather than mainstream political parties.

Amid this discontent, which appears to be growing in developed democracies, British comedian Russell Brand has even called for a revolution. "Imagining the overthrow of the current [British] political system," Brand confesses, "is the only way I can be enthused about politics."

Brand's thoughts may have struck a chord, but young Australians should not expect even minimal change in their political settings or institutions anytime soon.

While an odd comparison, Papua New Guinea– Australia's nearest neighbour of seven million – illustrates the sturdiness and endurance of democratic institutions that are very similar to Australia's. PNG's Westminster democracy – a legacy of Australia's colonial rule – has in fact persisted despite relentless instability and calls for change.

Since being granted independence from Australia in 1975, PNG's institutions have faced seismic internal and external pressure. Cabinet reshuffles, weak party discipline and shifting political loyalties in the national 111-seat unicameral (single house) parliament have resulted in corruption and undermined the effectiveness of PNG's legislature.

Armed conflict has also put pressure on PNG's political settings. A decade-long insurgency on the island Province of Bougainville culminated in the 1997 Sandline affair, which provoked a tense standoff between the PNG Defence Force, the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary and then-Prime Minister Julius Chan. The collapse of the state was thinly avoided.

National elections, which take place every five years, have also undermined PNG's commitment to democracy. Administrative irregularities, intimidation and violence occur in some but not all parts of the country, testing the legitimacy of PNG's electoral system and democracy more broadly.

Amid these chapters of institutional strain, many academics, commentators and politicians have been vocal about wanting to see a change to PNG's political makeup. There are many competing views on reform but two broad themes usually emerge.

Firstly, many would like to see greater decentralisation in PNG – more decision-making at the local level and independent from the capital Port Moresby. Secondly, others wish for a more decisive Presidential-type system to replace the turbulence and instability of PNG's Westminster politics.

The broad message is clear – any wholesale reform is better than PNG's current political system. "We need to," as the PNG blogger Martyn Namarong summarises, "sort of create a different playing field."

However, despite these pressures, PNG's political system endures. Power remains centralised, elections persist, candidates are voted in and out, government is formed, and legislation is debated and amended. PNG's institutions may be unhealthy. But undesirable and not undemocratic, they remain the formal arena for state power and managing disagreement.

When looking more broadly at institutional change in liberal democracies, it becomes clear that large scale reforms, particularly of the radical kind, do not progress far. In the 1960s, for example, calls for institutional change were expressed loudly on university campuses and streets across the Western world.

Like today's 'generation next', these movements were animated by a similar dismay with political structures and a desire for change. But to fast forward half a century from the 1960s, the institutional scaffolding remains – elections, legislative process and traditional political parties.

While an imperfect comparison, PNG's turbulent experience over the past four decades is instructional to those calling for an overhaul in Australia's institutional settings – don't expect change any time soon. Liberal democratic institutions, like those shared between PNG and Australia, are not designed to shift and change tack upon the winds of social media.

While this may invite a sense of helplessness, change in Australia's democracy occurs by working through established and agreed institutions. In seeking reform, 'old' or 'traditional' politics then becomes more and not less relevant. This is because mainstream political parties, by aggregating competing interests and orienting them toward political power, are the vehicle for enacting ideals into public policies.

The most obvious current example is the contrast in approaches between the Occupy Movement and the Tea Party in the United States. The latter organised politically, influenced a mainstream political party and utilised institutions to effectuate change. The content of the policies aside, it is clear which approach was more effective.

Writing on the growing numbers of young people disillusioned with political parties and mainstream politics, one Australian journalist recently concluded, "where this leads no-one knows."

But I would suggest that, at least in Australia, we have a fair idea. History shows that mainstream politics and institutions will be with us for some time. The message then is obvious; those young Australians that claim to be disenfranchised must find ways to interact within traditional politics. Ironically, for those individuals or groups that are serious about change, an interest in so-called 'old' politics may increase in the coming years


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mrs Barbara Short

At the moment in Australia we have the media upset as the federal Government is not telling them what they are doing, hour by hour. Under Labor we heard what the members of parliament were doing each day. They appeared on the media each day. The media felt they had some impact on them. They interviewed them, ad nauseum.

But I think many people, maybe a high percentage of the people, went off to work each day, and couldn't have cared less about what the pollies were doing, long as they did a good job. Evidently the majority did not consider that they did a good job as they didn't re-elect them.

Now it is up to the Lib-Nat. coalition mob to show us if they can do any better. The country is not run by the media, thank goodness.

Now the same thing is happening in PNG. The social media think they know everything. They would like to run the country - which they can't thank goodness, as we know they would be hopeless.

So we have to live with Representative democracy, and we have to talk to our representatives if we want change. And they have to talk to us. But we have to let them get on with the job, just as we have to get on with our jobs.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)