Modern PNG
Em normal

Breaking the ‘bystanding’ attitude in Papua New Guinea

BystanderRASHMII AMOAH

An entry in the Crocodile Prize
PNG Chamber of Mines & Petroleum
Award for Essays & Journalism

VERY many Papua New Guineans have taken to quietly pondering, heatedly debating or exasperatedly voicing concerns about our nation's seemingly interminable downward spiral.

Our feelings sway between blood-curdling anger and deflated hope.

Themes of lawlessness, corruption, family breakdown  and ineffective service providers punctuate an endless list of societal dysfunction.

Tirades of 'PNG wanem taim bai yumi senis?' [when will you change?] reverberate across households, streets and office work stations. Social media platforms are inundated with expletives and slander as individuals use electronics to wrestle out their discontent.

Meanwhile, institutions, groups and individuals churn out declarations to encourage pro-social behaviour as a lifestyle choice for Papua New Guineans.

These vessels for social change work tirelessly to implement their objectives. However, their effectiveness is sporadic and negative commentary is persistent. Complaint outnumbers compliment.

Perhaps it the ease with which we attribute all this to an ‘attitude problem'? It’s a phrase cited by many people who seek a causal link between the stagnancy of positive social change and the surplus of strategies.

Continual emphasis on a nation's demise fuels cesspools of frustration and feelings of helplessness. A barrage of criticism without any offer of personal contribution is counter-productive. Yet with so much discontent, perhaps the masses are on to something!

Could it be that the Papua New Guinean ‘attitude’ is a by-product of the very mechanisms that are being implemented to engender change? Perhaps Papua New Guineans are simply not responding to over-recycled, exorbitantly priced and apparently ineffective programs.

The pendulum swing intended to catapult citizens into a frenzy of active participation in social change has, instead, created passive observers. It has spawned a nation overrun with bystanders.

Let me explain. The Bystander Effect (Darley & Latane, 1968) provided insights from social psychology theory initially popularised through a murder case in the United States.

In short, this theory stipulates that individuals in a large crowd are unlikely to respond to help another who is in distress.

Two reasons are attributed for this. Firstly, the individual sees that no one else is responding and takes their cue not to intervene. Secondly, the individual believes that someone else from within the crowd will help.

In both scenarios, the result is that there is no response. Inaction from the individual. Now let’s consider this in the context of Papua New Guinea.

Distressing situations attracting crowds is typical of everyday PNG. Inaction by witnesses is the standard. A typical afternoon at the bus stop sees tensions boil over amongst commuters as each jostles to claim a seat on the PMV (public motor vehicle).

Verbal aggression and even physical altercations ensue. Rather ironically stickers inciting citizens to 'Stop the Violence' and ‘Keep our City Clean’ are plastered all over the vehicles.

Roadside, female-to-female violence attracts jeers and whistles of encouragement, the crowd rapidly increasing in numbers. Residents gawk nonchalantly from behind their fences. Meanwhile colourful billboards emblazoned with messages of self-efficacy occupy street corners. Before long they’ll be defaced by graffiti, betel nut spittle or pointless acts of vandalism.

Clearly, Papua New Guineans are struggling with the transference of message to action.

Social change programs implemented via government entities, civil and faith based organisation and individual donors are an increasingly permanent fixtures in our society. So too the social issues they seek to address. 

So why do Papua New Guineans continue to witness but not intervene? How do we move away from being a people with an ‘attitude problem’ and towards being a nation devoted to ‘community responsibility’?

One may suggest that core values of care, concern and respect for others’ well-being and safety are not emphasised enough or are altogether missing in the multitude of operating programs.

Papua New Guineans, young and old, are flooded with the guidelines to living a socially conscious life. Yet the flow-on effects of individual positive action to the community remain abstract.

It seems Papua New Guineans are unclear as to how singular actions contributing to the collective will generate the ‘change’ much yearned for.

Surely it is time those in control of the purse strings became more stringent and demanded that program providers jump off the bandwagon of familiarity and voyage down the path of innovation.

Equipping Papua New Guineans with individual skills should be the benchmark. Instilling transferrable attitudes and behaviours should be the measurable outcomes.

A Papua New Guinean who can demonstrate the capacity to voluntarily, at any time, use positive actions for the betterment of society ought to be a key indicator of a program’s validity, reason for ongoing implementation and thereby funding. Papua New Guineans deserve programs that work.

Practising empathy, combating negative behaviour with the use of positive images and role models with whom individuals can relate are pivotal strategies of the cited theorem.

As an extension, perhaps only Papua New Guinean nationals should be allowed on the frontline of program delivery and implementation. This follows the line of thinking that Papua New Guineans are more likely to relinquish ‘bystanding’ if they see their own countrymen in the forefront of a movement.

And what might be a realistic, practical, cost-effective and age-inclusive method to cultivate a strong sense of ‘community responsibility’ across all sectors of PNG? A public-library.

Public libraries are arguably a prime avenue where individuals can practice and observe how their positive action benefits a larger group. Membership is free but regulated in accordance to the individual’s demonstrated commitment of respecting the shared library resources.

Here, there are no ‘bystanders’. All library members are ‘active participants’ in ensuring that each upholds and contributes to the resource longevity.

In a nation where the enterprise of second-hand merchandise flourishes, such hubs are commonly considered treasure troves.

The potential for sourcing library resources is seen in the influx of organisations supplying literary resources throughout our country.

Public libraries: an inadequately-tried but perhaps more effective small step toward breaking the ‘bystanding’ in PNG. 

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

trish nicholson

An excellent post Rashmii, and as one of your earlier commenters pointed out, applies more widely than PNG.

But your sharing this post on social media again in the context of domestic violence is highly relevant and it is in this light that I comment now.

One step away from 'bystander', but equally powerful in allowing bad actions, is social acceptance by silence when not actually at the scene of a disturbance or attack.

One very simple example that points to something every man can do to reduce domestic violence in their community: men know who are beating their wives, and because they say nothing, the abusers feel vindicated and accepted by wantoks and in their usual social circle.

Instead, if men shunned the abusers in the bar, on the deck, at the football game, wherever - and said quite simply why - the abusers would soon feel the impact of behaviour that is not socially acceptable.

By not doing this, men encourage domestic violence as if they did it themselves. It is already illegal but laws don't work unless attitudes change.

It's the Bros who have to show it is unacceptable and it can be done without even being 'at the scene'.Social inclusion/exclusion works well to encourage appropriate social behaviour.

Rashmii Amoah

Arthur Williams - thank you for comments. I do agree with the thought that bystanding is perhaps a symptom of our economic system.

In PNG, the trend seems to be that as long as flashy price-tag is quoted, a handful of localised jobs created and a free shirt and sticker thrown in, PNGns are expected to accept that a policy/program will work /is working.

Never mind it's appropriateness for the context or modelling on evidence-based practice for that matter.

Rashmii Amoah

Hi Dr Schram - thank you for the comments and link. What I found most defining in that scenario were the comments about there being an unspoken understanding between the 'active' bystanders knowing what the mutual goal was and a sense of 'shared identity' amongst 'active' bystanders.

Concepts that seem to go hand-in-hand and something I'll look to reading up more. Most certainly I think effective leadership is a way forward to combating the Bystander Effect.

In the case of PNG, an increased exposure to positive imagery of leadership taking place in everyday life/situations across a variety of settings is a means by which PNGns may be enabled to their change their mindsets and thereby, actions.

Arthur Williams

Sadly I think PNG's is no different to the ethos prevailing here in the UK.

We recently had a general election in which the winning party told deliberate lies.

The leading opposition seemed powerless to counter them.
34 % failed to vote and are typical bystanders uninterested in politics or the change they could bring about if they lives were less hedonistic.

Yet post election they too will be the grumblers about any government policy which impinges even slightly on their lifestyles.

I believe it is a symptom of the economic system we now exist in. Perhaps a result of the globalisation which is trying to reduce the World to a mere almost soulless economic entity.

For the bystanders of PNG – 80% rural dwellers - life outside their daily subsistence existence is almost no concern.

Certainly Moresby's events, good or bad as they may be, have almost no bearing on tonight's meal of kaukau or sacsac with some green ferns that their grandparents or even great grandparents would similarly have eaten years before.

At least their still remains a rhythm of customary life away from the clamour of the towns. Clan leaders can still hold some sway over their clan-folk.

Only this past day we read of displaced Manam islanders complaining of the breakdown of their traditional society as they have languished for over eleven years in the Bogia area on someone else's land.

And there lies the rub - land!

The elites of PNG and foreign capitalists haven't been able to sit still in their seats as they fly over the vast tracts of undeveloped land that remain in PNG.

Terra-nullius is not now available to the exploiters so they had to subvert PNG political elites to passing bad laws like the still extant SABL catastrophe or ILLG which have been perverted by savi-men into their pet schemes.

My own family lost their land for 99 years without any financial benefit to them and with no prior knowledge of the Gazettal of a SABL for their traditional lands.

Alas for the squatters in their urban sites they didn't even have tradition on their side when the exploiters wanted their little half acre.

We are viewing White Heart Village, China on our UK TV screens it:

Like many other nameless villages before it, White Horse Village must make the necessary sacrifice. All of its emerald rice fields are disappearing under concrete. The houses the farmers built themselves, houses they were married in, houses their children were born in, are being demolished.

Even the ancestors have to go. Their very graves are being moved.

Not surprisingly, feelings can run high. Last year alone, Beijing recorded 74 000 violent protests nationwide, many of them over the expropriation of land and property.

Some have ended in pitched battles, arrests, even murders. Unlike PNG the law says the land belongs to the Chinese nation not to individual farmers.

There are rules governing compensation for their usage rights. But that still leaves farmers watching their livelihood and their identity disappear overnight as developers turn enormous profits.

Bystanders of the 21st century all over the world seemingly powerless to avoid their fates.

John Kaupa Kamasua

Rashmi, as they say attitude is everything!

Albert Schram

Thank you, interesting piece illuminating some self-destructive attitudes which would otherwise be very hard to understand.

With effective leadership, however, the bystander effect can be broken. "When 100 people lift a bus" is a recent example of this: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-32993891

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)