The flag of the nation
The rite of marriage in Buin

Finally! Julie Bishop speaks out about money laundering

Grant WaltonGRANT WALTON | DevPolicy Blog

IN 2012, Sam Koim, head of PNG’s Taskforce Sweep, called Australia the ‘Cayman Islands of the Pacific’ for money laundering.

Koim was drawing attention to the millions of kina that have been laundered into Australia by PNG elites – much of it ending up in the Cairns property market.

His comments reflected his, and others’, frustration that Australia was doing very little to respond to the laundering of ill-gotten gains.

Since these allegations the Australian government has been, by and large, silent about PNG corruption and money laundering. There appears to have been a greater willingness from Australia to cooperate with PNG investigators: in 2013 Koim noted that since his speech Australia increased its cooperation with Taskforce Sweep. But little was said publicly.

As a regional power, it’s important that Australia publicly demonstrates its commitment to the rule of law in the region.

So it is heartening to see that on the back of a media investigation into PNG money laundering (which has gone viral on PNG social media sites), Foreign Minister Julie Bishop has spoken out about Australia’s role as a destination for PNG’s dirty money.

In a recent Fairfax media article, she is quoted as saying:

We take very seriously allegations that the proceeds of crime in PNG and the proceeds of corruption can be laundered in Australia…We are working closely with PNG to ensure Australia is not a safe haven for the proceeds of corruption.

Of course, these words need to be matched by action – specifically investigation into the transnational flow of corrupt funds – but Bishop’s response is welcome. It was also good to see Bishop saying that Australian authorities recently recovered $574,000 of ‘misused’ aid money.

Still there’s more that needs to be said (and done) about political corruption in PNG. We are still waiting for Australia to publically condemn the defunding of Taskforce Sweep. And Australia should be speaking out about Peter O’Neill’s refusal to submit to an arrest warrant, which was issued last year but is still being contested in the courts.

Australia doesn’t need to become the Pacific’s morality police (there’s plenty of corruption here), but as Stephen Howes and I argued in August last year, it should speak out when there have been flagrant attacks on anti-corruption institutions and legal processes in the Pacific.

Let’s hope that Bishop’s recent statement is just the beginning of a more meaningful conversation about corruption in PNG, and between PNG and Australia.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Joycelin Leahy

About time, but will this make any difference? How do you reverse what is already in Australia?

Lindsay F Bond

No worry that announcement (Try or No Try) is slow to appear on the score board, footy fans expect some lengthy reviews of video.
Also despite by processes of length, PNG folk see their courts deliver respectable verdicts.
Nonetheless, ministerials can come correctly not only at the last.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)