What Papua New Guineans really think of Australia
08 September 2015
After 40 years of independence from Australia, 77% of Australians said their country has a moral obligation to help Papua New Guinea [Lowy Institute poll]
Australia is a democracy
democracy means freedom
but freedom in your care
is now deprived and denied
for Australia is silently,
through legal means, fascist;
fascist and racist
[poetic comment by Jimmy Awagl on Manus detainees, 6 June 2015]
SO here we are, approaching the 40th anniversary of Papua New Guinea independence, with PNG a strong, unified, democratic country and, despite the occasional hiccough, its relationship with Australia in sound and stable condition.
It seems everything in the garden is, or should be, rosy. But is it? We asked a Papua New Guinean focus group for its opinions and this is a summary of the discussion.
The general attitude of respondents is that Australia is a great country to live – “a place of great opportunity” – and visit. It’s a place where “people respect your privacy but are willing to assist you if you are in distress”.
There was a strong minority opinion, however, that saw Australia tainted by unfriendly visa policies which made it tough for ordinary PNG citizens to enter.
Australians are seen as a generous and down to earth people who, in their interactions with Papua New Guineans, are friendly, open-minded, tolerant and courteous.
“Most Australians are easy to approach and willing to engage in conversation – whether you’re acquainted with them or not.”
There was particular mention of those Australian volunteers and missionaries who came to PNG to work and who “positively influenced the lives of many people”.
A distinction was made between Australians in Australia and Australians living in PNG. Australians in Australia were not perceived as knowledgeable or very interested in PNG. Even Australians in PNG for the most part were seen as somewhat detached.
“On the whole I’ve found that Australians who live in PNG are there for the job rather than the cultural experience…. They tend to stick to themselves.”
Another respondent agreed. “From my observations, it’s usually special functions like Christmas parties that Australian families socialise with national families.
“But I’ve much admiration for the Australians who work with local charities and who work in smaller NGOs and come into contact with everyday PNGns on a daily-basis.”
Respondents felt the best things about Australia’s relationship with PNG are training, education, trade relations and aid, although there was some negative comment on the “boomerang” aid that returns funds to Australian firms.
People continue to reflect positively on the Australian government’s support and role in Papua New Guinea’s independence and they continue to value the relationship.
And then there was more pragmatic reasoning. “I think Australia maintaining a relationship with PNG is beneficial for Papua New Guineans. It provides a link to a lifestyle and culture that many Papua New Guineans have experienced through work, study or holiday visits.”
Respondents tended to agree that, in recent times, the Australian government has changed its attitude towards PNG. “It’s not as it was in the 1980s,” said one.
“Australia is less engaged with PNG as they focus more on Asia,” said one person. And another: “Most definitely.”
The visa issue continues to put a dampener on the relationship. “The visa application process is a source of major frustration for many Papua New Guineans.”
The Manus detention centre is also a continuing problem. “I can’t help but feel that Australia has employed bully tactics to impose its wants upon PNG.”
One person felt that the Australian government did not have a clear picture of the real issues in PNG.
“There is a problem with the diversion of money from foreign aid programs. While some programs are conducive to national growth and development, I question the validity of others.”
We asked people if they thought the PNG government has any responsibility for the current problems it faces. As you might expect, corruption loomed as a major issue.
There was also a feeling that there is a lack of political will. “Key people and agencies are either indecisive or lack government support to get work done,” said one respondent. “Greed and systemic corruption from the top down is crippling service deliver in this country.”
Another said: “I think the growing presence of Asian countries engaging in business could affect PNG’s attempts to move away from anti-corruption.”
People felt that, to strengthen its relationship with PNG, Australia needed to “treat PNG as an equal partner”.
Another respondent commented on a need to “improve transparency of dialogue between the two governments where decision-making is concerned” suggesting that “social media could be used by both governments to keep Papua New Guineans well-informed of what is happening.”
Other people suggested that money laundering in Australia needs to be cleaned up, that Australia should be more respectful of PNG and (again) that visa processing should be made more efficient and sensitive.
In the wash-up, though, most respondent were in the camp of one person who said simply: “I love Australia and Australians.”
Another said: “I feel privileged to have been able to live, receive an education, work and start raising a family in Australia. Life can most definitely be enjoyed in PNG but is enhanced by the magterial, emotional, intellectual and social aid has provided and continues to do so.”
And the last word: “My encounter with Australians as individuals is that they have and continue to contribute a lot to the development of this nation.”
Interesting that no one bit so far on my last conjecture about what system may work for today's PNG.
Clearly the Westminster system doesn't and who is to say it is currently working for us?
I thought the real answer lies in recognising what human systems of government worked in the past given the circumstances that existed at the time.
The one that comes to mind immediately is a feudal system without the hereditary nobility and a firm but fair method of administration.
Now where on earth did that work previously?
Posted by: Paul Oates | 10 September 2018 at 10:10 AM
I agree Phil. But what do PNG people want and who could truly represent them, given such diversity across the nation?
What paradigm would work? What model is better then the ones we are trying to sell?
Where has another scheme worked before given that humans are after all the same people wherever they come from or go to. We have the same genetic makeup and keep trying to reinvent the wheel.
Posted by: Paul Oates | 09 September 2018 at 07:53 PM
I think one of the biggest problems with Australian aid is that it is geared to Australian standards.
We want Papua New Guinea to be just like us. We want it to have the same kind of government, the same kind of public service and the same kind of social service.
When we give Papua New Guinea aid money to improve governance, for instance, we want it to develop a parliamentary system just like ours.
Sometimes that kind of outlook means bashing square pegs into round holes.
The Americans have the same kind of problem. They want the whole world to look just like them.
Posted by: Philip Fitzpatrick | 09 September 2018 at 04:49 PM
For once, can Australian politicians and bureaucrats announce to the PNG government that corruption is its real big issue and its public service is dysfunctional and non-performing.
Give us no more sweet talk of strengthening institutions, capacity building and Manus.
You must be real, talk from your heart, do not pretend and stop lying to yourself.
Posted by: Mathias Kin | 09 September 2018 at 10:40 AM
I agree with you Phillip. The central issue is that PNG as a nation and as a people must evolve and take ownership of their own problems.
When I read the innumerable discussions on the problems PNG faces today, one of the ever present topics is that everyone is describing the problems rather than coming up with home grown solutions.
It's rather like the old cargo cults and money cults of the past. The intermediate steps in creating wealth and opportunity seem to be missing with only the opposite ends of the known continuum being identified.
I suggest this is not a problem exclusive to PNG. It is a natural occurrence in all human societies when the opportunities are known but the paths to obtain them are either not well understood or just missing.
Making it happen is never easy. Ask any old Kiap about that problem.
The real logjam in PNG is that those who are lucky enough to benefit from available opportunities fall into two categories.
The fortunate and lucky few elites and the those who seek personal gain at any price including selling their own country out.
Many people in societies around the world are caught up in this dilemma. How do you make things that are clearly desirable actually happen?
There is only one way. Effective leadership by those who genuinely are committed to help their own society. In this case, PNG must cut the umbilical cord of foreign aid dependency, leave the warm and comfortable nest and grow up as a fully fledged nation.
The old story about 'He who pays the piper calls the tune', is just as true today as it was centuries ago when it first identified.
Only those aid programs designed to set up and maintain self perpetuating and nationally beneficial objectives are the ones that should be accepted.
Unfortunately, humans of all ages are susceptible to accepting short term lollies without thinking about the long term, painful visit to the dentist.
Posted by: Paul Oates | 09 September 2018 at 10:06 AM
It's time Australian taxpayers should say enough spoon feeding and enough is enough, go your own way.
We are creating dependency syndrome and becoming beggars.
The only way to grow is to be independent and find our own means to survive.
Posted by: Philip Kai Morre | 08 September 2018 at 10:11 PM
For me Australians are brothers and sisters from another Mother.Its very easy to talk to them and they are also very good people.
Posted by: Francis Boso | 08 September 2018 at 04:39 PM
I think that Australians really like PNG people. By this I mean Australians who live in Australia.
When they first come to PNG they also like them and are happy to give them a fair go and befriend them. This all ends when they find friends from within their own social circles and join the clubs.
It is then considered to be low-class to admit to knowing the name of your house-staff, who has become a nameless, faceless person.
Years ago we owned and operated a video library in Lae and I seemed to meet most newly arrived expats, particularly the women who came to change their videos in the days before cable tv.
I would take them to the market, help them find a good house-girl from within my own network and supply them with cuttings from my pot-plants and orchids. They were genuinely interested in the cultural differences compared to their lives in Australia.
Only after they had joined the clubs did their attitudes change and they learnt the dreaded C and K words that refer to Papua New Guineans (nothing to do with sexual organs but even more demeaning).
I have often thought about how the change in attitudes came about but am convinced that it has been their loss.
Sadly we now live behind high fences and locked gates and expat children never get to interact with PNG kids as all expats of my age (69) have wonderful memories of shared meals in the domestic quarters and lots of wonderful daring and clean games with the "pikininis".
Posted by: Donna Harvey-Hall | 16 September 2015 at 11:11 AM
I have been to Australia about five times.
On my first visit, I landed in Cairns and the elderly taxi driver very quickly asked me from where I was from the highlands adding he had been a kiap in the Southern Highlands.
I said I was from Enga. We freely talked as if we'd known each other for a long time.
He drove me around Cairns until he found me a good hotel near the train station. He left when he was sure, I was properly booked in.
Another taxi driver did the same from Brisbane airport to the city until I was booked into suitable accomodation. I have met many more likeable people like these two gentlemen.
Australians are good.
Posted by: Daniel Ipan Kumbon | 09 September 2015 at 09:53 PM
I agree with Daniel. Rose and I have had to navigate our way through the NSW health system over the last few months and in that time we met a specialist who served at Lorengau hospital, another who spent four years in Lae (Angau Hospital), a nurse who worked at SOPAS and an auxiliary who went on a hiking trip to the highlands and stayed at Kudjip.
All had fond memories of PNG and were extremely positive - especially happy to try out their Tok Pisin.
If only we could encourage more personal relationships, skills exchanges and good memories like this.
Posted by: Peter Kranz | 09 September 2015 at 04:26 PM
As a Papua New Guinean I think of Australia as a father who let his son sail this independent state ship without equipping him with all the knowledge and skills required.
And during this forty years he has been supplying him with tools to do corrective maintenance....
Posted by: Doreen Bauloni | 09 September 2015 at 03:05 PM
I think you are right when you say that the relationship of people from both countries on a personal level is much more important than the politics Daniel. It's probably more important than the economics too.
I think there is more of a feeling of equity in the personal when we simply regard each other as fellow human beings.
This is a fact recognised by the readers of PNG Attitude but I'm not sure our politicians share the same view.
If they did, for instance, they would reconsider the inequities in our visa systems and maybe be a bit more creative when it comes to aid programs.
Posted by: Phil Fitzpatrick | 09 September 2015 at 07:59 AM
If there is a problem with PNG and Australia, it has to be only political.
The Australian public are very friendly, open and easy to get along with. Those who've worked in PNG will greet you with a ready smile and strike up a conversation easily.
And those who are married here will refer to you as a 'tambu' meaning we are family.
That is better than talking about politics, development, aid assistance, economics etc.
The relationship of people from both countries on a personal level is much more important.
Posted by: Daniel Ipan Kumbon | 08 September 2015 at 06:37 PM