Conflict resolution in PNG: A friend to all and an enemy to none
An epic tale from PNG: Baby Peter and the return to Tingwon

PNG needs a capable media unafraid to offend those in power


“THE pen is mightier than the sword” is a saying writers are familiar with.  However in today’s media age it is the media corporations who seem to truly appreciate the power of those words.

Governments, politicians, international organisations, multi-national corporations and pressure groups all understand the reality that they have to master the art of pursuing their strategic interests through the media.

Media corporations, advertisers and prominent writers and commentators know they can manipulate and influence the opinions of the masses by controlling the information they release and get a desired reaction by playing around with words to create certain images in people’s minds.

This has led to the development of a new and, I believe, dangerous trend where the media’s historic role of keeping people informed now plays second fiddle to profit making and power projection.

The danger lies not in the shift of focus but in that the integrity of people can now be bought at a price and the power to control information lies in the hands of a select few.

Journalist and author John Pilger has written much about how the United States government used the media to cover up the many atrocities it committed in Iraq, including the indiscriminate bombing of small villages and embargoes on desperately needed medicines.

Most of the media instead focused on justifying the American cause in Iraq. There was a price tag on integrity. To articulate the mainstream view was a good fit with capitalism and corporate endeavour.

Closer to home, the media’s reputation in the Pacific and PNG was generally better. Papua New Guinean journalists prided themselves in their objectivity in keeping people informed and in using the media to fight inequality and corruption and promote development.

More recently, however, the coverage of some complex and controversial issues has led me to question their ethics and competency.

PNG media coverage of the Julian Moti issue, for example, left me questioning their impartiality and capability. Moti was branded by the media as a rapist, child molester and fugitive.

When I first read of his case as reported by one of PNG’s dailies, it left me disgusted at this man.

Later, while at university, I came across the Moti issue again and, having access to the internet, I was able to read a range of articles from different perspectives. With my eyes now opened to the facts, I felt disgusted with the PNG media’s coverage of the case.

To my surprise, I found the matter had been tried and discharged in a competent court comprising senior judicial officials from New Zealand, Australia and Vanuatu.

The damaging headlines in the PNG media contradicted principles of natural justice including the presumption of innocence until proven otherwise.

It was incongruous that a man who was proven innocent by a competent court was deemed guilty of alleged crimes and that his fate was decided by the politicians and the media and not the courts.

Essential facts like the Australian government’s sudden interest in the case several years after it was tried and discharged by the Vanuatu High Court and what this meant to the welfare of the Australian defence force operation in the Solomons, where Moti was Attorney-General, was an important aspect of the story that was thoroughly distorted and misrepresented by the media.

The PNG media’s complicity in being a cheer squad for a dubious Australian (and Papua New Guinean) political position posed many questions including was it a sheer inability to pursue investigative journalism, was it profit motivated or was it something much more sinister involving the political interests of national governments?

Media coverage of the dramatic PNG political impasse of 2011 which saw Sir Michael Somare overthrown and Peter O’Neill succeed in his grab for power also left much to be desired.

The media’s failure to understand the PNG Constitution and to communicate clearly and accurately the ruling of the PNG Supreme Court was contrary to its duty to remain neutral and objective.

The media might argue that it did not want to get involved in politics; however the decision to report as it did compromised the truth and misled the people. This assisted soften the heinous crime committed against the people of PNG in allowing an illegitimate government to run the country.

Most people quietly accepting the turn of events without realising they had been cheated and their democracy undermined.

I would argue that these and other events are examples of media corporatism and the fear of not offending those in power.

My deepest fear is that most people will read their papers and watch their television and accept things as they are presented without realising that the media is not reporting faithfully and, in so-doing, subverting democracy and human rights.

The people of Papua New Guinea need and deserve better than this from their media.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jack Klomes

The National and Post Courier (even EMTV) has been operating and making money in PNG for quite some time now. while I commend them for doing a good job of keeping people updated and apprised of PNG's current affairs much of their reporting on important national and international issues have been descriptive.

I always wonder why they have not progressed into producing analytical and investigative pieces on issues on national importance. I mean that surely would have seen an increase in consumers and profits!

Michael Dom

Mainstream media has become part of 'the system' that was once their arch nemesis.

But we now have the age of internet based news groups, such as loop png and other social media, which although raw and unprocessed, at least provides instant reflections of acts, events and scenarios.

Investigative journalism is much needed though and the simple hard-to-gets, like reliability, thoroughness, objectivity and journalistic integrity.

As for those who wield power, whislte-blowers, things like wikileaks and groups like Anonymous can put the fear of God into them.

The fear of certain knowledge that no matter how long it may be and what they may enjoy in the meantime, their time will come to an end.

Kela Kapkora Sil Bolkin

Nowadays most journalists up people who sought them grogs, free trips and cash and down people who do not give them a pitance for a bottle of beer.

In fact, their reporting is all subjective.

I don't buy both the National and the Post Courier nowadays.

Joachim Lummani

Jack, what you say is very true. It would be true to say that when the media gets tangled up in ratrace politics, it tends to operate below the bar.

Watching the US polling going on, for example, one couldn't believe how low the media can fall when truth and integrity are compromised. It is as if the media is really insulting the intelligence of ordinary citizens.

People have the right to be told truthful news. I hope PNG media act with dignity and take a stand. It is really unethical for the media to dampen the conscience and/or terrorise the thinking capacity of our own citizens through the spread of distorted facts and truths in the service of some vested interest groups in society, notably those who wield power.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)