Why don’t Australians care about PNG? Is it the writers?
24 February 2016
MOST people in a literate society understand the power of the written word.
Not just books, journals and newspapers but almost everything people see on television, in cinemas and on social media begins with a writer.
If the writers in a literate society ever went out on strike en masse many things taken for granted would grind to a halt.
Although people may not be familiar with the particular works of a significant writer, they will more than likely have heard of them.
There is also a special national pride in home-grown writers. Intelligent people read widely because they realise the power of knowledge. They know that ideas shape a society and the source of those ideas largely is in writers.
In non-literate societies the appreciation of writers and the written word is nowhere near as potent. Because the written word is not part of people’s day-to-day concerns they do not appreciate the latent power that lies there.
When Third World pre-literate societies began striving to become nations in their own right, they quickly realised the power of their writers. Conversely, despots in those nations suppressed writers to prevent that power from transforming society.
Papua New Guinea is an example of a country that has yet to discover the power of the written word. While there has been no conscious effort to suppress writers, the lack of assistance and encouragement by government has had a similar effect to that of a greedy despot.
Many contributors and commentators on PNG Attitude write about the failure of Australia to notice the existence of Papua New Guinea on its immediate northern borders.
One of the reasons this happens is because PNG has not allowed or encouraged its writers to develop a national narrative to lift its profile in Australia and the rest of the world.
What passes for a Papua New Guinean narrative in the Australian psyche is a distant memory of the battle along the Kokoda Track during World War II and a vague acknowledgement that PNG was once a colonial territory. There is little else to inspire Australian recognition.
The writing that is published within PNG, mainly in the two major newspapers and a few other publications, is bland and often reproduced verbatim from texts and press releases provided by the government or vested commercial interests. There is no bold investigative journalism nor much attempt at creative writing.
The absence of a writing culture in Papua New Guinea became abundantly clear when the Member for North Fly and then Minister for Tourism, Arts and Culture, Boka Kondra (picture), addressed the gathering at the 2012 Crocodile Prize awards ceremony at the Australian High Commission in Port Moresby.
Mr Kondra read a prepared speech that had been written by Dr Andrew Moutu, the Director of the National Museum and Art Gallery.
It was a good speech but the minister, who had once been a school teacher, stumbled and bumbled his way through it. Sitting at the back of the assembly, I could see the nervous and embarrassed reaction of the audience.
Part way through the speech, the minister came to a reference to pioneering writer Russell Soaba. Russell was sitting at the front of the gathering and was to be honoured by a lifetime achievement in literature award.
He looked increasingly uncomfortable as the minister spoke.
The minister then looked up and stared at Russell, who he had been introduced to before the formal speeches and awards. Mr Kondra looked back at his speech and something clicked in his head.
He grinned broadly and pointed at Russell. “It’s him!” he said.
It was as if he had turned over a rock and found a gold coin underneath. There was a distinct murmur in the audience while the minister absorbed this amazing discovery.
That a minister in the government and an ex-school teacher knew nothing about one of Papua New Guinea’s pre-eminent writers spoke volumes.
The irony that he was reading a speech extolling and supporting PNG writers but knew nothing about them himself was not lost on the audience.
The fine words crafted by Dr Moutu had been rendered mute and meaningless. It was not unexpected.
When the speech was later published on PNG Attitude it attracted no comments.
Excellent piece, Phil. Equal access to free press and expression is a foundation to a free society. It is important for our young people to engage in reading and writing.
Social media and current technology is a powerful tool the young people use and are comfortable with. In the US, the young people helped elect the first black man to the White House to two terms. He still remains popular among this group.
Posted by: Joe Herman | 25 February 2016 at 03:39 AM
An active and free media is the fourth arm of democratic government.
Posted by: Michael Dom | 24 February 2016 at 04:38 PM
There are several preconditions for the advancement of human societies and one of these is that ordinary citizens are able to read and write.
In the absence of large scale literacy, what the communists called "the masses", are very easy prey for a powerful ruling elite, however that is comprised.
By limiting literacy to an elite, the rulers of society are able to exert considerable control over the dissemination of information and ideas, especially those that are not to their advantage.
Thus, for centuries, the early Christian Church was able to dictate what constituted acceptable ideas about the nature of a just and good society, while ruthlessly suppressing writings that contradicted or called into question the Christian orthodoxy of the time.
Famous examples of books which were placed on the Catholic Church's index of proscribed texts include Copernicus' treatise on the motion of the planets, Darwin's Origin of Species and D.H. Lawrence's Lady Chatterley's Lover.
This action, combined with the use of the apparatus of both church and state to crush dissent, severely curtailed both the acquisition and dissemination of both ancient and new knowledge which, in turn, gravely hindered the development of science and technology.
This is but one example of how the powerful use privileged access to information to confuse, mislead and deceive.
Now, of course, we have "spin doctors", whose task it is to do pretty much the same thing, usually by grossly simplifying very complex issues into simple, plausible and frequently entirely false statements.
Two gifts of unsurpassed value and power which the colonial administration freely gave to PNG were the English language and access to education. It is hard to over estimate just how important these are in terms of promoting the emergence of a modern, vibrant state that serves the interests of its people.
Thus, when Phil laments the failure of PNG to consciously and determinedly promote indigenous writing, he is pointing to a problem that is much bigger than the mere failure to produce a body of distinctive indigenous poetry and fiction.
PNG has, thus far at least, failed to produce a seriously capable print and broadcasting media that can accurately, persistently and unflinchingly examine and criticise the actions of the government and the bureaucracy.
PNG politicians needs to feel genuine unease if not outright fear when they are confronted by the media, not see it as just another chance to promote their "brand" or to "spin" a message to suit their purposes.
Phil's message is not mere quibbling of minor academic interest: it goes to the heart of what constitute a good, just and more equitable society in PNG.
Posted by: Chris Overland | 24 February 2016 at 03:38 PM
Phil....good one. Writing as you say is not a very strong culture in PNG. University students stumble and have great difficulty in writing and presenting in English.
Young people in the country do not appreciate the enormous power of reading and writing.
Posted by: John K Kamasua | 24 February 2016 at 01:40 PM
What you say speaks to the underlying importance of the continued existence of PNG Attitude as a catalyst in progressing the relevance of literacy amid the turbulence of modern times.
Posted by: `Robin Lillicrapp | 24 February 2016 at 06:09 AM