Small-scale mining returns as Bougainville revenue earner
Reports: Students clash with UPNG security; vehicles torched

PNG's appetite for debt is reckless & profligate

BPNGCHRIS OVERLAND

ONE of the lessons of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) is that any bank which makes itself hostage to one asset class or, worse still, one major debtor, is placing itself in a very dangerous position.

America's biggest banks grossly over invested in toxic collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) because these products were supposed to be AAA rated and ‘bullet proof’ investments.

They weren't, and the ensuing crisis brought the world's financial system to the very edge of complete collapse.

Unhappily, it seems that the main lesson learned from this crisis by the banks is that because they are considered too big to fail, government (that is, the taxpayer) is compelled to rescue them in the event of failure.

This has created what economists call moral hazard, whereby banks feel able to take increasingly big risks to make profits knowing they will be rescued if their improvident lending puts them in jeopardy of collapse.

Put another way, they are like a teenagers with mum and dad's credit card, spending up big while all the while knowing that paying back the accumulated debt won't be their problem.

Sir Mekere Morauta has pointed out what should be blindingly obvious to those who are willing to see it: the O'Neill government's policies are placing Papua New Guinea’s banking institutions in mortal peril.

Some heroic assumptions appear to have been made about the underlying robustness and stability of not just PNG's economy but that of the wider world as well.

History shows that, within a capitalist system, betting that nothing can or will go wrong is an exceptionally stupid bet.

Right now, globally, total private debt as a proportion of GDP is much higher than immediately before the GFC and is climbing rapidly. The highest and fastest rises are occurring in Hong Kong and China. Australia is not immune from this phenomenon.

Total government debt is also much higher than before the GFC because governments have had to recapitalise their private banking systems to prevent their collapse.

Governments have also borrowed heavily in an effort to stimulate economic growth, which across most of the world remains anaemic at best.

This is not a situation that would encourage a prudent banker to take major risks with bank funds, yet this is exactly what is happening in PNG.

The history of banking failures is that the people creating them never think there is a problem right until the moment that a collapse is imminent. As was the case for powerful institutions like Lehman Brothers, this can happen, quite literally overnight.

PNG's situation, much like Australia's and many other countries, is far more perilous than their respective governments are willing to admit.

Not only do governments not know how to stop the rapid accumulation of unsustainable private debt but their great fear is that even acknowledging the growing problem might trigger the very crisis that they are desperate to avoid.

Like the proverbial rabbit in the headlights, they can see the oncoming truck but remain paralysed in its path.

My fervent wish is that someone, somehow, is going to be able to do something to prevent a repeat of the GFC but I fear it is too late.

If I am right, then the PNG's banking system will very likely collapse. That is a high price to pay for the O'Neill government's financial recklessness and profligacy.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Lindsay F Bond

Spectator sport to some viewers, spectre the sum to those yet unseeing.

Paul Oates

Who in today's terms understands the terms like 'fiscal stimulus', quantitative easing', government bond floats and issues and 'deficit spending'?

In reality they stand for spending money the government of the day doesn't have and creating a debt for future generations who may not yet have been born to worry about while those responsible laugh all the way to the bank with their Parliamentary pensions and ill gotten gains.

I can remember the reverse terminology being sprouted by John Howard when he was Treasurer in the late 1970's saying a credit squeeze it was simply 'mopping up surplus liquidity'. Great play on words except to those who had to cope with higher mortgage payments.

The real issue is the inability of the voters to understand these jargon terms (presumably created by financial spin doctors), and to translate them in to layman's terms so that they can be fully understood.

The expression 'Toxic loans' were simply another recent attempt to obfuscate what in practical terms are clearly potential loan defaulters who are being offered or have been given financial loans that they could never repay. These loans are not from the banker's own money but from their depositor's money. In any other financial terms, this is clearly fraud and illegal activity.

Why oh why can't we see that and force those who are supposed to be looking after our financial safety to be accountable for their greed and illegal activity?

The issue is easily understood. No one really wants to trouble themselves until the problem directly affects them. Then they cry blue murder and ask why didn't someone, anyone, the 'gavaman' etc. protect them?

Wake up all you who constantly plead innocence and lack of knowledge. You now know the problem so when it happens, don't cry 'poor me!' It's your problem, you deal with it.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)