Staying afloat in Melanesia: is PNG on its way to bankruptcy?
15 June 2016
SALLY ANDREWS | The Diplomat | Edited extract
SECURING long-term economic viability remains a challenge for the Melanesian states, with geographic isolation, climate change, natural disasters, and aid dependency presenting significant problems for these relatively young countries.
With about seven million people and a GDP of $18 billion, Papua New Guinea is the largest Melanesian nation in both economic and population terms.
The PNG economy is largely based on its extractive industries and rich mineral deposits, which has left the country extremely vulnerable to downturns in global commodity markets.
PNG’s economic plans formerly revolved around the $19 billion Exxon Mobil liquefied natural gas project, but the economy was badly hit by the drop in global oil prices in 2014.
The impact was made all the worse by the fact that PNG is one of the most natural-resource dependent countries in the world.
With 80% of citizens still in the subsistence agriculture industry, investment in human capital has been sorely lacking in PNG, with successive governments focusing most attention on the extractive industries.
PNG was originally predicted to be the fastest growing economy in the world for last year, with a GDP growth rate of 15% projected in early 2015. This optimism was short-lived.
The O’Neill administration had been running steep budget deficits for some time, resulting in a sharp downturn in growth projections. This saw the adoption of drastic austerity measures, including savage cuts of 30% to administration, infrastructure, education, and transport.
PNG must urgently pay back its debts; any further drops in credit rating could well cripple the country into the next decade.
PNG currently faces a dire shortage of foreign exchange, highlighting the fact that international money markets are increasingly regarding the country as a risk.
Whilst the O’Neill government is maintaining a cool façade, this cash flow crisis is prompting many to speculate that PNG is on its way to bankruptcy.
Meanwhile, no attempts seem to be underway to undo PNG’s pronounced dependency on mining, with the Chinese-backed, $1.6 billion Ramu Nickel mine re-opening recently under controversial circumstances.
The immediate way forward for PNG probably lies in more spending financed by extensive new loans, although it is difficult to see where these lenders will emerge from.
The Melanesian states struggle in general with attracting private investment and creating investor confidence.
Aid dependency, resource dependency, and natural disasters remain huge challenges for the region. All four of the countries are continue to receiving significant aid from Australia.
Whilst Australia is by far the lead donor in each country, they are also receiving increased attention from China, whose Pacific Islands pivot is causing concern in Washington and Canberra.
China’s aid and investment focus on the Pacific looks set to change the future of infrastructure and development in the region in a major way.
However, all the development assistance in the world will not cure Melanesia of its resource “curse,” and crafting a sustainable growth model for the 21st century looks set to be the key conundrum facing Vanuatu, the Solomon Islands, Fiji, and Papua New Guinea.
The question as to what is keeping Melanesia afloat is only going to become more important in the ensuing years. It is an issue that desperately needs to be addressed before pundits too hastily seek to condemn increased Chinese or Japanese investment in Melanesia, particularly in light of continued cuts to the Australian aid budget.
As the effects of climate change become more severe, and controversy grows over the slash-and-burn tactics of the extractive industries, the Melanesian states had best start searching in earnest for alternative solutions.
Sally Andrews is a New Colombo Plan Scholar and the 2015-2016 New Colombo Plan Indonesia Fellow. She is a Director of the West Papuan Development Company and the 2016 Indo-Pacific Fellow for Young Australians in International Affairs.
If Stephen Hawking holds the human race as chemical scum on a moderate-sized planet unlikely to survive a further 1,000 years, who then casts blame on cattle or any other animals while ignoring human activity in such breeding?
Let intellectual energy in PNG students and their 'industry' find quantum advantage for all humans within their nation and for all humanity.
If PNG PM is hawking PNG prospectus to France, well might hope be for advantage bilaterally and exemplary.
Let the PNG PM more closely study France and its tripartite motto, liberty, equality, fraternity; how this has internalised and energised; and how tolerance is institutionalised in industrial vigour.
Posted by: Lindsay F Bond | 16 June 2016 at 08:28 AM
Perhaps PM O'Neill remembers that Napoleon rose to power after he had ordered his cannon to fire on the mob?
What was that famous Mao Zedong quote? : "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”
Posted by: Paul Oates | 16 June 2016 at 08:21 AM
Sort of confirms that O'Neill is definitely delusional. Did he mention to the French that he had to shoot a few uni students last week?
Posted by: Philip Fitzpatrick | 16 June 2016 at 07:12 AM
I've never thought of subsistence farming as an 'industry' - everything seems to be an industry these days, even football, where players are referred to as 'product'. I've always thought that industry refers to factories. Is it just the economists inventing new jargon so that they sound good or is there something more sinister at work.
And Robin, if you've ever knocked around in the outback you will see how incredibly destructive sheep and cattle can be, let alone all their farting of methane. It's all part of the artificial world that humans have created and which is destroying its host.
Posted by: Philip Fitzpatrick | 15 June 2016 at 09:01 AM
As more efforts are directed toward emissions reduction so is there a declining importance of hydrocarbons in the economics of tomorrow.
Even the intensive farming of animals is under review as thy are deemed to contribute to carbon emissions. Some smart and innovative thinking may be needed to chart a course through troubled waters.
Renewed Demands To Tax Red Meat To Fight ... - Technocracy News
www.technocracy.news › Climate Change
Apr 27, 2016 - TN Note: The global attack on beef and dairy cattle is totally irrational and yet is dead serious. Alarmists claim that cattle produce an unfair ...
Posted by: Robin Lillicrapp | 15 June 2016 at 07:08 AM