Dangling biological tools
A charter to make our country a better place

Roads, bridges & sea links the key to effective aid delivery

Building the road to KarimuiFRANCIS NII

LAST week we read Lindsay Bond’s story of the opening of three bridges worth K139 million at Eroro, Girua and Ambogo in Oro Province, built with the support of Australian aid, and yesterday we read of the death of a mother of eight children in Dr Kevin Pondikou’s searingly personal piece.

These articles brought a million thoughts to my mind of what wonders Australian aid could have brought to Papua New Guinea had more attention been focused on building roads and bridges to link rural areas and urban centres.

Australia spent millions of dollars on her colony prior to independence and continues to spend $500 million annually even today, but why has this aid money not transformed the lives of the rural masses scattered across remote and mountainous terrain and on islands separated by often treacherous seas?

The efficacy of Australian aid money on the lives of Papua New Guineans, especially in rural areas, has often been raised in PNG Attitude and remains a matter of contentious debate.

It brings forward related issues like how much of this aid money goes back to Australia in the form of contracts, company profits, consultants and procurement of Australian goods and services.

It is understandable that, for political, economic and security reasons, Australia has her own foreign aid priorities. However, as a political and economic powerhouse in the Pacific, her aid money should make colossal and sustainable impact in a recipient country like PNG.

In PNG, infrastructure such as roads and bridges is key to dismantling development obstacles and disparity, lopsided social services and opening up economic development opportunities.

In order for social services like health and education to cheaply, equitably and effectively reach the bulk of PNG’s population in isolated rural areas, roads and bridges are vital links.

The people of PNG know how to survive in this harsh environment, either with or without the presence of government.

They know how to get to the nearest health centre or market. They will carry a sick person long distances to get to the nearest health centre; they will paddle a canoe for many hours to get produce to market. They are born and bred to walk and paddle long distances no matter how severe the sun, wind or rain. It’s in their blood.

They have a natural ability to survive which serves them well, but even this does not allow them to overcome every disadvantage of being remote from the benefits of modern life.

Efficient road and sea links would solve many problems as well as opening up new business opportunities.

Of course, health and education, the two sectors that Australian aid concentrates on, are important. But how can these services reach the people and transform their lives if there is no efficient, low cost and reliable transport?

Take for example, a place like Karimui in Simbu Province, which is often described as ‘coastal’ in the highlands because of its unique condition for growing all kinds of crops like coffee, cocoa, coconut and betel nut but which has no road link with the rest of Simbu and PNG.

After almost 41 years of independence, this huge area of high economic potential and its 12,000 population are only reachable by which makes delivering health and education services to the people very expensive.

It costs an average of K6,000 to airlift just one sick person or pregnant mother from Karimui to Kundiawa. Air charters to deliver education services cost around the same.

If there was a road link, the K6,000 could provide access to health centres for 600 sick people. Motor vehicle hire would cost only K1,000 a return trip to Karimui to deliver educational materials and staff.

Moreover, Simbu as a province could change greatly because of the huge economic potential of Karimui.

In Karimui, Yehebi and many other places like them, there is no significant physical evidence of aid money; very little has trickled down to those whom aid is meant to benefit.

I am not advocating that all Australian aid to be concentrated on building roads and bridges for PNG but aid should create a rippling, continuing and monumental impact in PNG so that effective health and education services are available to all communities regardless of whether they are in rural areas or urban centres.

The $500 million of aid money Australia spends on PNG each year could have transformed the lives of the rural majority had it been concentrated on opening up the isolated rural areas to the outside world.

Francis NiiAs far as PNG is concerned, no matter how much aid money Australia spends on health and education services, its impact in rural areas will continue to be insignificant compared to towns and cities because of the cost of service delivery.

If Australia is serious about its aid money making a sustainable transformation in the lives of the bulk of Papua New Guineans, it should be thinking seriously about roads and bridges.

Without solving this problem, equitable delivery of health and education services will remain as great challenges to Australia and PNG.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Peter K Paghau

Francis I agree. Priority roads like, Moreguina to Safia to Bareji and Siai to Ioma to Kira to Garaina to Wau linking CP to Oro to Morobe, Robinson to Gurney (CP to MBP), Gulf to Morobe, Tari to Oksamin to Tabubil including ferry crossing the Sepik and Ramu rivers for Madang/ ESP, WHP/ESP, Enga/ESP are major projects.

PNG government keep spending existing roads and directing Donors to spend on the same.

I think it would be useful for one donor to spend a on brand new road every year like the Highlands highway been done by Dillingham Corporation before independence.

The National and the Provincial government can do the major feeder roads linking these inter Provincial roads.

Michael Dom

One road could change the entire political and socioeconomic core of PNG - link Port Moresby to Momase and the Highlands.

MP's would not sit so comfortably in their seats.

Citizens access to their capital city is a hallmark of democracy.

Philip Fitzpatrick

You could maybe add road and sea transport to Gary Juffa's list Francis.

Paul Oates

Thank you Francis. You have again effectively enunciated the issue that prevents in many of us who understand but are effectively excluded from helping.

There you are on the Northern side of the Torres Strait and here are many of us on the Southern side. We both can see and understand the problem.

The blockage that is responsible for this 'intransigence of intent' effectively lies with those who are currently in charge of the government systems on either side of the Torres Strait.

I have for years offered at no cost, my experience and help and have where possible followed that through wherever I could. But this has only assisted in small ways and the main problem remains unchanged and resolute in it's determination not to change.

It's a bit like Governor Juffa's offer to help the government free of charge. For exactly the same reason, those in charge are quite comfortable with the current situation, 'thank anyway'.

There appears to be only two ways to remove this 'Gordian knot'. Either you and others who are committed to the same objective patiently unravel the strings and ropes of that convoluted knot or someone like Alexander simply draws a metaphorical sword and simply cuts the knot and opens the gate. The problem with Alexander's solution is what happens when the knot is removed? Unless there is an effective organisation and an ethical leadership already in place, nothing will change and when the modern Alexander departs, everything goes back to what it was.

Going on the events of last week, it is clear that no one at the moment locally has the potential to lead an effective attempt at cutting the knot. Therefore it remains for those who do know what to do, to start at the beginning and patiently start unraveling the knot and building a believable and proven leadership.

What is required on your side of the Torres Strait is the opportunity to request the right sort of help from the right sort of offers. Until that happens, we on our side of the Torres Strait who do understand and could offer positive help in this matter are effectively stymied.

Olsem wanem ol wantok? Displa wok ino isi tasol sapos yu laik wokabaut lo displa rot yu mas stretim tingting blo yu na girapim olgeta husat igat kainkain tingting olsem. I nogat narapla rot.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)