The writers: Lorraine Basse – a balanced approach to heritage
How the few dominate the many: Stalin, Mao, Trump & PNG

Tuition fee free policy leads to disengagement with schools

A village schoolBOMAI D WITNE

THERE are differing views among parents and teachers about Papua New Guinea’s tuition fee free policy.

The government’s policy is well-intended and should be seen as heavily subsidising tuition fees, which does leave some responsibility for tuition fees with the parents.

But this is not the case now. The government wants to pay full fees and has told parents to ensure this direction is complied with by schools.

Since its inception the tuition fee free policy has placed schools under stress. Some of the best schools in the country, which were held in high esteem, are no longer excellent as a result of the policy.

Schools are struggling and deteriorating rapidly in all aspects. It’s a shambles. School management and boards are confused on how they can reinstate them to effectiveness.

The policy, as you might expect, saw an influx in student enrolment. Some schools thought that hosting high student numbers would increase allocated funds.

But the fund was never enough to expand the required infrastructure development in schools. In some schools, students spill out of classrooms built two decades ago to hold 30 pupils and now forced to accommodate 60.

Realising this predicament, schools decided to charge ‘project fees’ to address the infrastructure shortage - and now the government is telling schools to stop this. The incredible message is that schools should shut up and keep enrolling students without considering infrastructure.

Some parents, not wanting to pay any charges, have aggressively supported the government in creating what is a chaotic school environment.

Removing parental responsibility for children’s fees also disengages parents from participating in the development of their children and their school.

The outcome - when parents see children’s education and infrastructure deteriorating, they will remain quiet because they do not have a hand in the schooling process.

In a highly illiterate society like ours, the people do not clearly understand the relationship between themselves as taxpayers and the government.

The school authority controls the cheque book and commits schools to spending – scrupulous or unscrupulous. What used to be checks and balances on school expenditure at the weekly parents and citizens day are no more.

Some schools incur more debts than the tuition fee free policy allows. Blame is externalised – often on a former principal or head teacher. It seems there is no way of stopping such shady practices or of holding the culprits accountable. Most teachers are quiet on this. A few of them share the loot between themselves and are always looking for the next opportunity.

The whole area of this policy needs to be reconsidered and some responsibility for tuition fees thrown back at parents who, with their money at stake, are likely to engage more with their schools and teachers.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Lindsay F Bond

Prospects for school infrastructure in Papua New Guinea might be helped by keeping memories of how the education sector started and your school buildings come into usage.

By example from Waseta, Oro Province, the buildings are named after the persons who caused the beginning of the school at Waseta. As told by Mr Bevan Kipling Ihove, Headteacher 2008, six village chiefs are celebrated for their activity and commitment.

“Horepa was a village chief of Koropata who indicated the idea of establishing the school after enrolling his child at Isivita Mission School and attending church services.

Ihimpa was one of the village chief and a policeman. He was the only person who knew how to speak English. He took Horepa and Tangivo to Isivita Mission Station and saluted Fr Henry Holland and gave some gifts to start school and mission station.

Tangivo was one of the village chiefs of Waseta. He was also involved with the other village chiefs to bring about the school and the mission.

Karonga was a village chief and land owner. He had no children so he decided to give away the land to the Mission (Anglican) to build the school.

Okasi…the village chief who was also a landowner who had committed his contribution towards the establishment of the school.

Kando was one of the village chiefs who also involved in the negotiation to build the school and mission station.”

Schools in other places will have their own histories and forms of remembering. Planning for the future of your school can be helped by remembering its history.

What then?
Firstly, this is to encourage people today to keep or to start a history of their school.
Secondly, share those histories on the Internet such as at ‘Wheres My School’.
Thirdly, if no Internet, mail your school history to me (sorry no payment, no prizes.)

Francis Nii

Impartial, unbiased and independent inspection is a thing of the past. Now everything is venal and favouritism is rife...too bad.

Paul Oates

Whatever happened to the system of periodic inspections by the school inspector in each district and now province?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)