Are our consumer habits killing our own PNG businesses?
Foreign exchange restrictions in PNG: costs & remedies

Billion kina down drain in illegal Oil Search share deal debacle

Mekere Morauta (2)
Sir Mekere Morauta


PORT MORESBY - I was astounded to hear news of the O’Neill Government’s fire sale of its shares in Oil Search at a loss of more than a billion kina.

We always knew that this illegal deal between the prime minister, Oil Search and Union Bank of Switzerland was a bad deal, a bad investment and a bad use of public money, but we never knew it would be this bad.

The total cost to the people of Papua New Guinea is likely to be more than K1 billion. Prime Minister Peter O’Neill must come clean on the exact costs.

He must also come clean on whether the sale was caused by his government’s inability to repay the loan. For Sir Moi Avei, chairman of Kumul Petroleum, to say that the decision to sell the shares was a commercial decision taken by the board is not believable.

Selling at a loss – announced by Kumul Petroleum as $US254 million - is not a sound commercial decision. The shares were legally owned by the bankers as security for the loan; they were not Kumul Petroleum’s to sell.

Obviously Kumul Petroleum and/or the O’Neill Government could not meet the repayments, and was forced by the bankers to sell, in order to minimise their loss.

Mr O’Neill must also tell the nation what the balance of the loan was left to pay.

A full, independent inquiry is needed into the deal, which was initiated personally by the prime minister and the Oil Search managing director, Peter Botten.

It was done in secret in Australia and PNG, without the proper authorisation of parliament.

It was signed, sealed and delivered by Mr O’Neill as acting treasurer after the then treasurer Don Polye refused to sign because he regarded the deal as illegal and bad. Don Polye has been proven to be absolutely correct.

The prime minister was also advised by the Office of the State Solicitor that the deal was illegal. Furthermore, Mr O’Neill as minister responsible for Kumul Petroleum, and sole shareholder in the company, misused his position by foisting the UBS loan onto the company’s books.

Now, as minister responsible for Kumul and as sole shareholder, he has secretly gone along with a fire sale.

Those responsible for this loss of possibly K1 billion of public money through illegal means must be held accountable.

In the forthcoming sitting of parliament, Mr O’Neill should table all the relevant documents relating to his financial disaster.

These include all of Kumul Petroleum’s financial statements and all documentation for the deal in its possession, as well as details of the impact on Kumul Petroleum’s balance sheet.

Mr O’Neill should also table the terms sheet and other documentation for the original deal. The public, the owners of this investment and the people who will pay for the mistake, have a right to know the extent of profiteering by foreign banks, companies, and advisers.

The losses are not coming from Peter O’Neill’s own pocket; they are coming from the public purse. The man is not fit to be prime minister.

It is clear that the foreign banks involved have been secretly selling secured Oil Search shares over the past few months.

According to Kumul Petroleum, the final price for the last sale after the share market closed on Friday was $6.70 a share, compared to the price of $8.20 a share that Mr O’Neill paid and boasted about as a wonderful deal for the nation.

“This is the best deal for PNG,” he said in March 2014, predicting that the value of Oil Search shares would double over the coming months. “This is a huge financial gain for PNG,” he said.

The loss in the share price is just one part of the loss incurred on this illegal deal. Many hundreds of millions of kina must be added to this in the form of advisory fees, refinancing fees and other borrowing costs, interest costs, commissions, and the original loan set-up costs.

Then there is the lost opportunity of not being able to invest the K3 billion cost of the loan in the development of PNG, for example in essential services such as health and education.

In the public interest the prime minister must detail all of this, so we know what the ultimate cost is, and the likely impacts in the future. I estimate that K1 billion is a bare minimum. It would not surprise me to find out that it may be far more.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

William Dunlop

Michael - Derived from the Old Irish word 'luchopan', meaning "a very small body".

Erin Go 'Bragh. Slainte.

Michael Dom

O'Neill and Botten are leprechauns!

Peter Sandery

This all makes a bit of a mockery about Peter Botten's boast, some years ago now, and well before the genesis of this particular share transfer that's "What's good for Oil Search is good for Papua New Guinea," doesn't it?

It certainly does. I think both Peter's have some tough questions to answer about their judgement and strategic capability - KJ

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)