Albert Schram allowed to temporarily leave PNG to get PhD
Sedition case: ‘Fiji Times’ executives acquitted of serious charges

We gave away too much to PNG LNG, but not next time

PNG LNG wellDAN MURTAUGH & AARON CLARK | Bloomberg | Extract

You can read the complete article here

LONDON - The tiny, impoverished nation of Papua New Guinea came out on the short end of a $19 billion development with Exxon Mobil Corp to build one of Asia-Pacific’s biggest energy projects.

But, as the company pushes to expand the venture, the government is vowing that round two may require a much bigger payday for the locals.

By most accounts, the liquefied natural gas business that Exxon and partners built from scratch is an engineering and commercial success.

The PNG LNG venture, which started operating in 2014, is delivering more fuel than expected to Asian economic giants Japan and China.

It’s so promising that the US company -- with annual revenue 10 times larger than PNG’s economy -- declared the Pacific island a key building block for its future growth and plans to double output.

Trouble is, the original deal reached a decade ago has failed to deliver the windfall to Papua New Guinea that the government and an Exxon-commissioned study predicted.

An International Monetary Fund analysis showed “quite limited benefits” for the country, which granted Exxon generous rights to recover certain costs before paying taxes or fees.

While the initial investment was welcome, the government has formed a new team to negotiate better terms before it approves the proposed expansion.

“There is a general view that PNG gave away too much for the first LNG project,” said Peter Koim, a member of the negotiating team who is also director of the country’s gas project coordinating office.

For the next round “the country will not give away concessions as was the case in the PNG LNG project,” he said.

PNG LNG produces gas from wells in the forested mountains known as the Highlands, and sends it 700 kilometers southeast via pipeline to a processing plant on the shores of Caution Bay, near the capital, Port Moresby.

The gas is super-chilled to liquid form and loaded onto special tankers for shipment overseas. Originally designed to process a maximum of 6.9 million metric tons a year, the plant produced more than 8.2 million in 2017.

Exxon last year spent as much as $3.9 billion buying access to additional reserves and drilling rights in the country and is working with partners including Australia’s Oil Search Ltd. and France’s Total SA on a separate $13 billion venture known as Papua LNG.

The development would add 8 million tons of additional annual processing capacity at the existing PNG LNG plant, but tap gas deposits in a different part of the country and require a new pipeline.

The country will negotiate separately with Exxon and Total on the different projects that will contribute to an overall expected rise in the nation’s gas exports, Koim said.

Demand for the gas has been strong. Long-term supply contracts were signed with buyers including chemical makers and utilities that are as much as 4,500 kilometers across the sea from PNG, which is located on an island just north of Queensland.

With global consumption booming, analysts see a shortage of LNG coming in the early part of next decade, right when an expansion project would come online if work were to start soon.

Prospects are so promising that Exxon’s chief executive officer Darren Woods said as recently as March that he is counting on PNG and several other countries to help reverse declining output at the company, one of the world’s largest energy suppliers.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Arthur Williams

Smiled at the authors of Bloomberg report calling PNG ‘tiny nation’ typical western idea from looking at their school atlases.

As I wrote recently why is PNG allowing an exploitation cartel for its energy reserves by allowing Esso, Total & Oil Search to collude in next major LNG project.

Below the Bloomberg article reported here was another energy item: ‘Exxon to Slash Gas Flaring 25% by 2020 in Emissions Push.’

When flying over oil fields in latter part of 20th century I always wondered why there were so many managed fires near the oil derricks.

Now I know the oil companies don’t own the wasted gases and so couldn’t care less about trying to use them. Surely it would enhance profits and importantly cut down polluting emissions.

The oil Papua Gulf explorers in 1980s thought it was OK to set light PNG’s gas after they found what they wanted under the seabed.

Finally I ask again why did Esso want a 700 km pipeline rather than a refinery in the Gulf Province?

Recently read: The latest 336 metre-long Venturer is the last of three offshore LNG giants to make the voyage to the Browse Basin in West Australia.

Apparently each giant ship is a floating production, storage and offloading facility that can directly export frozen LNG worldwide. It is cyclone proof and hold over one million tonnes at any time.

So PNG’s Gulf people are right in wanting such facilities within the province rather than kowtow to Esso et alia for it to be refined in Moresby.

Philip Fitzpatrick

Here's another quote from the report:

"But often, citizens of poor or underdeveloped countries see little or no benefit from commodity extraction by foreign companies because their governments were inept, corrupt or both -- a symptom of what economists call the resource curse".

Sums up PNG to a tee.

Michael Dom

"The tiny, impoverished nation of Papua New Guinea"
The short, irresponsible PM of Papua New Guinea

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)