Panguna people & the money syndrome
Remembering the boy on the postage stamp

Call for more aid as PNG faces corruption crisis

Ben Packham
Ben Packham - journalist with The Australian newspaper and plenty of PNG experience

| The Australian

CANBERRA - A review of Australia’s annual $578m aid program in Papua New Guinea has warned law and order is deteriorating, corruption remains rife, and “weak” governance continues to hamper basic service ­delivery beyond the capital, Port Moresby.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade review found the performance of Australia’s biggest country aid program was falling short of expectations and “restorative action” was necessary.

It called for an overhaul of the way Australia delivers aid in the county, saying there was an over-reliance on technical advisers — which PNG has also criticised — to build the capacity of government personnel and institutions.

It also said Australia should ­instead ramp up its support for “progressive reformers” to agitate for change in PNG.

The critique comes at a sensitive time in the Australia-PNG ­relationship, with PNG Prime Minister James Marape calling for up to half of Australia’s aid to the country to be poured into the nation’s ailing budget.

The Morrison government has rejected Mr Marape’s request but is examining a potential loan, amid suggestions by Mr Marape that he could seek billions of dollars from China.

DFAT’s 2018-19 Aid Program Performance Report said PNG’s annual spending on health was just $50 per capita — 100 times less than Australia’s.

It said PNG also needed an ­estimated $1bn more each year for the next decade to invest in basic education — an investment that was “beyond the reach of Papua New Guinea and its international partners”.

“The cost of service ­delivery across Papua New Guinea’s difficult terrain are high. Those costs increase through corruption and weak management,” the DFAT report said.

It said the credibility of national policy-making and the effectiveness of the Papuan public service were “holding steady or modestly improving”.

But it noted: “An exception is law and order, which appears to be deteriorating.”

A lack of funding by PNG was compromising the effectiveness of Australia’s law and justice support and the ability of police to mount effective investigation and prosecution of serious crimes, corruption and family sexual violence, the report said.

The program’s performance in promoting effective governance and improving human development rated as “amber” in a traffic light ratings system.

 “While these two objectives have improved over the previous 12 months, due to slow progress in previous years and continuing difficulties with some investments, there is insufficient justification and evidence to rate them green in 2018-19,” the DFAT report said.

ANU development expert Stephen Howes said a recent World Bank assessment confirmed the Pacific was “perhaps the world’s worst governed region”, with six of 10 Pacific nations being rated as “fragile”, including PNG.

Professor Howes said it was good to see recognition of the program’s over-dependence on technical assistance and training, which was had also been a recommendation of a 2010 review of the aid program that he had co-written for the Australian and PNG governments.

Labor’s spokesman on international development and the ­Pacific, Pat Conroy, said DFAT’s over-reliance on external technical advisers was “undermining the aid program”.

“It is consistent with external analysis of the PNG aid program and is especially troublesome given PNG is our nearest neighbour and one of our most important international partners,” Mr Conroy said.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Stephen G Day

It is interesting to note that Australia is spending on the Transport Sector Support Program for road maintenance in East New Britain Province.

The calling, letting and supervision of the contracts has been left in the hands of the PNG Department of Works and Implementation (DOW).

The results of this would not pass scrutiny at any level. Work is being let in small value contracts in the vicinity of K500,000 each and the work is generally being done to a standard that does not conform with DOW's own Specifications for Roads and Bridges of 2015.

When the Australian officer responsible was challenged as to why this was being allowed to happen, he gave a rather strange justification for this failing by saying that Australia did not want to be seen to be "interfering" in the internal matters of PNG, and did not want to be seen to be acting in a manner that "might be seen as neo-Colonialist". Whatever that means.

The long and short of it is pretty simple. Australia is gifting the citizens of East New Britain some repairs to road infrastructure that has deteriorated to a terrible level, and the PNG government's DOW is either unwilling or incapable of giving PNG citizens a satisfactory product from that gifting.

As to the comments about an "over-reliance on external technical advisers", the comments I have quoted are from one of those same technical advisers.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)