Osikaiyang landowners out of order
Death of veteran actor Albert Toro

Alas, everything’s a deal these days

Phil Fitzpatrick at mic
Phil Fitzpatrick - "These days the strategic value of the small Pacific island nations is just as much a commodity as oil, gas and metals"


TUMBY BAY - Ever since neo-liberalism gained ground in the 1990s governments have persistently used economics to define their policies.

Neo-liberalism is used to refer to market-oriented policies such as eliminating price controls, deregulating capital markets, lowering trade barriers and reducing state influence in the economy, especially through privatisation and austerity.

Economists now seem to rule the roost. Unfortunately they don’t seem able to agree about much and they show a distinct lack of knowledge about anything beyond their narrow lens of interest.

They ignore inequality, have oversold the benefits of globalisation and are woefully inaccurate when it comes to predicting economic trends. They did not, for instance, foresee the global financial crisis of 2007-08.

The form of rationalism currently promoted by economists includes the idea that commercial activity has no room for moral considerations and that individual self-interest is all that matters.

The amoral and asocial nature of economic rationalism can be summed up in the well-known statement of British prime minister Margaret Thatcher in 1987, when she said: "There is no such thing as society. There are individuals, and there are families."

What Thatcher actually meant is open to dispute but since she uttered those words we have seen almost everything in society monetised and given a dollar value.

If you ask a politician today about what they are doing about a social issue they will invariably come back to you with a dollar value.

Throwing money at problems is of dubious value. Increasing funding for education, for instance, has been shown not to improve the standards of teaching in schools.

This is particularly so in places like Papua New Guinea where corruption is rife. Increasing the funding for education, health and other services simply increases the opportunities for theft.

The narrow lens that economists apply does not recognise a whole range of non-monetary values inherent in society. To quote an old adage, they know the price of everything and the value of nothing.

They don’t recognise, for instance, the values of contentment and happiness. Instead, they persist in believing that money can buy happiness.

If you follow the actions of Donald Trump, and increasingly Australian prime minister Scott Morrison, you will notice how the profit motive or the concept of value for money colours everything they do.

This is why Australia under Morrison now has no separate department for the arts and why literature has never gained any traction with the politicians in PNG.

They can’t see any profit and therefore don’t want to provide any support.

Doing a deal has now also supplanted what used to be domestic and foreign policy. Foreign aid, apart from humanitarian aid, now comes with a price tag.

All of the developing nations in the world now know that any aid they receive will come at a cost.

That cost may come in the form of housing unwanted asylum seekers or it might come in the form of making strategic assets like deep water ports available.

Given this shift in emphasis, it might be prudent for developing nations, particularly in regions like the Pacific, to consider what they might now safely trade for aid consideration.

Their tradeable stock need not relate to physical assets. Esoteric assets can have equally valuable currency.

Diplomatic recognition of Taiwan as part of China, for instance, now has an economic benefit and can effectively be sold.

In this modern dog-eat-dog world the geo-political strategic value of the small Pacific island nations is just as much a commodity as oil, gas and metals that come out of the mines.

If it is legitimate in these modern times to monetise everything then there is no reason why Pacific island nations can’t be pragmatic and monetise those more esoteric commodities they have in exchange for aid.

If aid and the receipt of aid is now a transactional arrangement then it might be time for Pacific leaders to work out exactly what they want to charge on their side of the deal.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bernard Corden

Anthem for Doomed Youth

What passing-bells for these who die as cattle?
— Only the monstrous anger of the guns.
Only the stuttering rifles' rapid rattle
Can patter out their hasty orisons.
No mockeries now for them; no prayers nor bells;
Nor any voice of mourning save the choirs,—
The shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells;
And bugles calling for them from sad shires.

What candles may be held to speed them all?
Not in the hands of boys, but in their eyes
Shall shine the holy glimmers of goodbyes.
The pallor of girls' brows shall be their pall;
Their flowers the tenderness of patient minds,
And each slow dusk a drawing-down of blinds.

Wilfred Owen


Paul Oates

If you follow your prognosis Phil, it fits very nicely into the current debate on climate change, global warming or whatever the current concern is about melting icecaps and rising sea levels.

Every small nation in the Pacific is currently using the current terminology to request action on their behalf. Clearly it is developed into an 'us and them' mentality. Every interview with a Pacific leader involves the use of the terminology at least once in every sentence. No balanced reference to burgeoning population growth at the same time you'll notice.

When you look at what is involved and the relative size of the populations of nations involved, the contest becomes almost farcical. Will China and India give up their ever increasing share of the earth's spoils? Will the average US citizen ever take an interest in where or who they sell their 'corn and beans' to if they have to stop using hydrocarbons to produce the food that is sold to those who haven't or can't produce it themselves?

You are on the money however as far as selling lifestyle and culture is concerned. These attributes are sought after by those who want to take an enjoyable break from the so called 'rat race'. Trouble is, it's becoming far to easy to just buy another electronic toy and not bother to take a holiday where you might have to do without your Maccas and favourite cafe latte.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)