2020 signals major change for PNG & the world
13 October 2020
ADELAIDE - Unfortunately the tides of history do not always move in a linear or predictable fashion. Take the Russian Revolution for example.
The first major convulsion within Tsarist Russia occurred in 1905. A combination of suppression and political concessions enable the old regime to remain in place but it was an ominous warning for the Tsarists that the status quo would not and could not last much longer.
Vladimir Lenin accurately described the events of 1905 as ‘The Great Dress Rehearsal’ for the cataclysmic revolution of 1917 which saw the utter destruction of the Tsarist regime, the murder of the Tsar and his family, the rise of the Bolsheviks and the creation of the USSR.
In a similar way, I think that the events of 2020 may be understood as the first obvious signs that the great neo-liberal experiment of the last 40 years is unsustainable and bound to collapse under the weight of its increasingly obvious flaws and contradictions.
In many respects, Donald Trump is the harbinger of doom for the ruling elite in the USA, not a sign of the triumph of neo-liberalism.
He is incapable of understanding let alone finding solutions for the tectonic socio-economic forces that are now heaving their way to the surface of US politics.
In a similar way, the conservatives in Australian politics are incapable of comprehending that the ground in shifting under their feet.
This helps explain their fixation with things like coal and gas as energy sources, their emphasis on f diminishing if not destroying the power of organised labour, the refusal to acknowledge that reducing the unemployed to abject poverty is socially and economically stupid and, until recently at least, the importance of running budget surpluses in the face of obvious evidence that this has no inherent virtue.
For Papua New Guinea, the emergence of forces for change presents both opportunities and threats.
It may give the country a chance to rebalance the resource development process which has frequently been organised against the country’s national interests.
PNG’s biggest recognisable threat at present is the demanding problem of how to effectively manage secessionist sentiment in various parts of the country without destroying the national unity that is desperately required to avoid fracturing the country into a collection of poverty stricken mini states.
So, while it is probably right to see 2020 as a pivotal year in many respects, I think, like Phil Fitzpatrick in PNG Attitude yesterday, that it is an error to assume that the necessary changes to the status quo will occur either rapidly or painlessly.
That said, trying to predict the future is fraught with peril for anyone, including historians, so my prognostications could be wildly wrong.
But the sheer number and scale of the problematic socio-economic and political issues now arising suggests that major systemic change is now both necessary and inevitable.
Yes, "Papua New Guinea is on course to rebalance the resource development process which has frequently been organised against the country’s national interests".
That old trick is being confronted with a deliberate and firm vision.
This decade is birthing a revolution for equitable distribution of the earth's resources - a clear fight against a gang of "exploitation and extraction merchants" who have entrenched themselves, pillaging and robbing the global south.
The second point about defragmentation and secessionist movements in Papua New Guinea is a far-fetched thought because this was an inevitable eventuality and line of thinking projected by Australia, UK and the rest who thought they were the reasons for instituting stability when in fact bulk of their activities were centred around plunder.
So, no. That is not happening in Papua New Guinea until and unless we have the usual sponsors of instability and regime changes want to peddle their well known dirty plays.
When that happens, or shows its ugly signs, Papua New Guineans are not that naïve and uneducated not to read and see and thwart it. We will defend that for the love of beloved homeland, Papua New Guinea and peaceful Melanesia.
Posted by: Corney Korokan Alone | 15 October 2020 at 09:19 AM
Kenneth Copeland is my man:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSIrQBGfUtw
Posted by: Bernard Corden | 13 October 2020 at 04:04 PM
Tide turn? The wash of opinions and pretence on pestilence foreshadows just more devastation. The atmospherics are overly vacuous.
The climate of persuasive dialogue, ominously at low ebb, now enters an era of centrifugal distrust.
See: https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/asia/western-world-waking-up-to-beijing-s-bullying-20201012-p5647l.html
Posted by: Lindsay F Bond | 13 October 2020 at 01:25 PM
It's interesting that the Bolshevik revolution occurred a year before the influenza epidemic in 1918 that killed millions of people worldwide. The current pandemic has a long way to go to equal the carnage that that plague caused in the world.
Presumably it was WW1 that was the catyclismic event presaging the revolution in Russia.
Maybe we're doing it the other way around this time - first a plague and then a war.
And then maybe a new world order, presuming there's anything left of the world to actually order.
Posted by: Philip Fitzpatrick | 13 October 2020 at 08:17 AM