Lupari said to have demanded payment from Paladin
26 October 2020
RICHARD BAKER
| The Sunday Age
CANBERRA - The chief secretary of the Papua New Guinea government, Sir Isaac Lupari, allegedly approached a director of controversial Australian immigration detention contractor Paladin for financial support, according to evidence provided to a Senate committee in Canberra.
Sir Isaac is one of PNG’s most experienced officials and is perhaps the second most senior figure in the government behind Prime Minister James Marape.
This is the first time his name has been directly connected to an alleged improper demand on Paladin.
The issue of Sir Isaac’s alleged dealings with Paladin was raised by Labor senator Kristina Keneally during her questioning of Home Affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo on Tuesday.
Paladin was controversially awarded more than $500 million in contracts from Home Affairs to assume responsibility for the now defunct offshore processing centre on Manus Island in 2017.
Ms Keneally, the opposition spokeswoman for home affairs, produced an email sent by former Paladin director Ian Stewart to senior Home Affairs official David Nockels which referred to the pair having a telephone discussion about the company’s exposure to corruption risks in November 2017.
Mr Stewart sent Mr Nockels the email after watching Mr Pezzullo give evidence before the Senate’s legal and constitutional affairs committee on April 4 last year during which he denied his department had received notification of any concerns about corruption issues relating to the Paladin contract.
Mr Stewart’s email to Mr Nockels stated that a PNG minister and a senior public servant, who The Sunday Age cannot name for legal reasons, “were unhappy that payments did not come to them either directly or through subcontractors”.
“I also discussed these approaches and previous direct approaches from [another senior PNG official] with you in early November 2017 from my recollection.”
Reading from Mr Stewart’s email and under the protection of parliamentary privilege, Ms Keneally revealed one of the officials who allegedly made direct approaches was “Isaac Lupari”.
Labor has previously sought to question Mr Nockels, a first assistant secretary, over Mr Stewart’s disclosures to him but he has not been made available to appear at recent Senate estimates hearings.
On Tuesday, Mr Pezzullo was resisting Ms Kenneally’s push for Mr Nockels to give evidence on the basis his departmental role had changed some time ago.
But the clerk of the committee advised that Mr Nockels could be called to appear to answer questions about his previous responsibilities.
The committee then held a meeting in private to discuss the clerk’s advice and ruled that Mr Nockels should join Mr Pezzullo to answer questions about Paladin. Mr Nockles had to rush to Parliament House to appear.
Ms Keneally took Mr Nockels to the April 4 email sent to his official government address by Mr Stewart and asked if he remembered a November 2017 phone conversation with Mr Stewart about alleged corruption and bribery in PNG.
Mr Nockels said he could not recall such a discussion. Before Ms Keneally could get another question to Mr Nockels, Mr Pezzullo intervened to say he as the head of the department would take the Labor senator’s entire question on notice and provide a response at a later date.
He acknowledged that Mr Stewart’s email “clearly must be on our systems” and committed to providing the committee with Mr Nockel’s official phone records for 2017 to capture any phone calls from the former Paladin director.
The Sunday Age approached Sir Isaac’s office for comment. He has previously distanced himself from reports of improper demands on Paladin by senior PNG officials.
Sir Isaac last year authorised an advertisement in PNG’s Post Courier newspaper that claimed “fraudsters” had been impersonating senior politicians and officials to seek improper payments from Paladin directors.
Commonwealth Auditor-General Grant Hehir in May reported Home Affairs had “largely” followed procurement rules in its engagement of Paladin and other contractors.
Mr Hehir found the awarding of contracts was “largely” in line with Commonwealth procurement rules and contractors’ performance was “partly adequate”.
But he also noted there were “no performance monitoring or reporting requirements for an average of eight months” while the contractors were operating under letters of intent until contracts were signed.
While intending no disrespect (by commenting from Australia), Lupari ain't in the league of Olam.
Leadership is the key to a grander PNG, and clearer, overt demonstrations of that are essential.
Posted by: Lindsay F Bond | 26 October 2020 at 11:20 AM
While I admire your indefatigable defence of Papua New Guinea's sovereignty and the intent of its government Corney, you cannot dismiss the rumours that have surrounded Isaac Lupari for some time.
Whether he is a paragon of propriety or something else is still open to suggestion I think. We all know that Papua New Guinean politicians and public servants take bribes and kickbacks.
What's more important for us in Australia is the cavalier way the whole regrettable Manus affair has been handled both here and in PNG: ".... there were 'no performance monitoring or reporting requirements for an average of eight months' while the contractors were operating under letters of intent until contracts were signed."
That statement is shocking in the extreme but viewed in the light of the many other revelations of our current federal government's dubious and downright corrupt shenanigans it doesn't surprise me.
Posted by: Philip Fitzpatrick | 26 October 2020 at 08:38 AM
Smoking guns can only be ascertained in email correspondences with time stamps plus their originating and destination IP addresses.
What's been stated is a telephone conversation someone allegedly had with the accused and that conversation being relayed in an email correspondence to someone else.
Telephone voice records can be fudged, altered and manipulated.
Furthermore, when high profile negotiations are afoot, stuff like this are bound to surface in an effort of tarnish Isaac Lupari (and others) who happens to lead the State Negotiating Team.
Ambassador Isaac Lupari is one of the key figures on the state leadership team, vouching for the national ownership of Porgera mine, with solid backing from prime minister James Marape and Enga's provincial governor Sir Peter Ipatas.
Lupari made some strong statements about the flight of some of the natural resource rich countries in the African continent, stating exactly how multinational corporations, particularly from the West have been and/are pillaging, exploiting and stealing them with little benefits in those host nations.
A case in point.
Barrick has been challenging tax evasion (to the tune of USD200 million) court battles with one of East Africa's emerging economies, Tanzania. That has been recently settled.
Just last week, they are being approved for much less CAPEX commitments with 50/50 equity sharing arrangements with Tanzania, which has never been the case before.
He also mentioned about challenging Barrick Niugini Limited (BNL) over environmental destruction and not honoring the settlements of the displaced land owners as captured in their mine development agreements:
https://postcourier.com.pg/lupari-considers-suing-barrick-for-neglect/
So the trickery that Western media plays to caste doubt and bring supposedly bad deeds of host country leaders is not a new innovation. We have known and seen such claptraps and plays before.
Australia's offshore settlement of refugees in Manus and Nauru using their own government made crafted procurement, supply and logistics contracts have been cooking for many years.
Their sudden attempts to export and share blames with everyone must be scrutinized and exposed for what the end goals they are trying to achieve here.
We read and connect dots here in beloved, homeland Papua New Guinea with the benefit of hindsight.
Manipulation propaganda sometimes doesn't land and wash here in Paradise.
Posted by: Corney Korokan Alone | 26 October 2020 at 07:12 AM