New checkpoint brings benefits to villagers
Why that Lowy incident will be remembered

Views on sand mining must be heard

Sir Arnold Amet
Sir Arnold Amet - The people have a right to be heard and their views to be considered

| My Land, My Country

LAE – Papua New Guinea’s former chief justice Sir Arnold Amet and leaders from the north coast villages of Madang have written to the Justice Department and the Mineral Resources Authority urging them to allow further consultation in relation to the proposed sand mining project.

Sir Arnold has echoed sentiments by people in the Sumgilbar local level government area that their views against sand mining have not been adequately heard.

Last year, the Mineral Resources Authority (MRA) conducted a series of hasty mining wardens hearings.

It drew anger from villagers who said they were not given enough time to assess the information given to them and to respond.

Those concerns attracted the backing of senior, influential members of the Madang community including Sir Arnold.

The former chief justice says the people’s right to be heard has to been considered and that it would be wise for the government to allow for the consultation process to be extended.

This is a debate that could soon evolve into a court battle between the people from the north coast of Madang fighting to save their homes and government agencies appearing to back a Singaporean company hell bent on digging up their sandy beaches for export to an Asian market.

If the project goes ahead, people living along a 50 kilometer stretch will be displaced and their beaches dug up.

It will also result in the destruction of internationally recognised nesting areas of the endangered leatherback turtles.

Sir Arnold and anti-sand mining activist Wenceslaus Magun, appearing on EMTV’s Infocus program, said the matter could end up in court and embarrassing the government.

“We have written to the Justice Department asking them to talk to the MRA to extend the consultation process.

“We are of the view that it doesn’t have to go to court. The people’s right to be heard must be considered.”

Those who support the project argue that it is in its exploration stages.

But people in Sumgilbar who attended the wardens hearing say the government’s track record of fast approvals and limited consultation leaves them with little option but to protest.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)