MAF’s PNG story started in tragedy
The rendering of change: there are means

George Orwell, change & the future

George Orwell
George Orwell described '1984' with its dark vision of the future as a warning. “The moral to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation is a simple one. Don’t let it happen. It depends on you.”

| Edited extracts

LONDON – George Orwell’s writing was profoundly concerned with social change, the relationship between past, present and future, and what this means for the individual.

His most celebrated and revisited work Nineteen Eighty-Four presented a chilling dystopian vision of the future which still unsettles and provokes today.

But this dark vision was rooted in his belief that a better, more equal world was achievable, a belief which inspired classics like The Road to Wigan Pier and Homage to Catalonia, as well as essays like The Lion and the Unicorn, which looked forward to the recreation of England after World War II.

In 1946, Looking back on his journey to becoming a writer, Orwell claimed that his main motivation was ‘political purpose’, which he defined in the widest possible sense as a “desire to push the world in a certain direction, to alter other people’s idea of the kind of society that they should strive after’.

Orwell’s desire to push the world in a certain direction inspired later writers and campaigners whether in politics, journalism or civil society, as well as countless individual readers.

But it was also the turbulent times he lived in which made George Orwell the writer he was.

Orwell was writing during two of the most momentous decades of the 20th century, the 1930s and the 1940s, when the kind of society people should strive after was fiercely contested.

As conflict spiralled around the globe, powerful ideologies like fascism, communism and socialism reshaped politics, and scientific and technological progress opened up new scope for human action, writers and commentators believed that the world was on the brink of a disorientating multitude of possible futures.

What Orwell wrote was a direct result of the actions he took. His investigations into homelessness in London and Paris, and the life of the labouring poor in the north of England, made him a fierce critic of inequality.

In 1936 Orwell went to Spain to fight in the Spanish Civil War as part of the ‘International Brigade’, socialists from across the world who were committed to supporting the Republican government. Orwell returned to England (only just escaping with his life).

He later said that all of his work since 1936 “has been written, directly or directly, against totalitarians and for democratic socialism as I understand it”.

Although a committed socialist, Orwell was often sceptical of the motivations behind grand claims to transform society.

In many of his essays, he asked perceptive questions of the utopian visions which many of his fellow reformers, inspired by rapid technological advances and optimistic visions of human nature, were caught up in.

“All ‘favourable’ Utopias,” Orwell wrote, “seem to be alike in postulating perfection while being unable to suggest happiness.”

As the dark visions of revolutions ‘gone wrong’ in Animal Farm (1945) and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) suggest, Orwell was not confident that change is always for the better.

Yet these novels were also born out of a conviction that the futures they described did not have to happen if ordinary people were vigilant and defended the values they believed in.

Orwell described Nineteen Eighty-Four, with its dark vision of a bureaucratic state, the denial of objective truth and crushing of individual freedom as a ‘warning’.

“The moral to be drawn from this dangerous nightmare situation is a simple one,” he said when Nineteen Eighty-Four was published. “Don’t let it happen. It depends on you.”


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Philip Fitzpatrick

Dissenters tend to get themselves thrown in gaol or murdered by the state Bernard.

That said, the world desperately needs dissenters right now.

Much more so than people sitting in their comfortable homes reading Orwell and others and nodding in agreement.

Bernard Corden

"Intellectual cowardice is the worst enemy a writer or journalist has to face… If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell (the proposed preface to 'Animal Farm')

"Freedom is always the freedom of dissenters" - Rosa Luxemburg

I was, I am, I shall be:

William Dunlop

Yes, Keith Jackson, assuredly so.

Stephen Charteris

"He [Orwell] influenced a great number of us who are still alive, and I guess he will continue to do so - KJ"

Yes, he did. This along with Chris Overland’s thought-provoking article evoke memories of a more hopeful time.

Being prescribed 'Animal Farm', 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' and 'Lord of the Flies' (Golding) was a wakeup call for starry-eyed boys in first year high school.

This was a time when one’s parents and teachers had lived through the predations of Franco and Hitler, witnessed first-hand the consequences of the collapse of laissez-faire capitalism and the dying of freedom across the western world.

As a result, they endured great physical and mental trauma to defeat it.

Growing up post World War II was a time of great optimism, of a vision of freedom and justice for all under a United Nations where anything was possible.

Mankind could land on the moon and make rice bloom in abundance in India. And to young men on the cusp of the great game of life the prospect of a repeat of the disasters of the previous generations seemed implausible.

In recent times, one cannot but see the rise of a new generation of dictators in Europe and the actions of Trump as clear parallels to the rise of fascism in the 1930s.

The politics of personality, the rallies, 'alternative' facts, blaming minorities and immigrants for society’s ills and the promulgation of the 'Great Lie' all are straight out of Mein Kampf.

We ignore the lessons of the past and the danger of conflating our biases with the truth, described so well by Orwell and Golding, at our peril.

Philip Fitzpatrick

Poor old Orwell. He described in great detail what was wrong and issued countless suggestions about what should be done but in the end he was totally ignored.

I wonder what he would make of our world today, which is probably in more dire straits than when he was alive.

He influenced a great number of us who are still alive, and I guess he will continue to do so - KJ

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)