Does PNG need a ‘Christian country’ declaration?
Marape to Toroama: ‘My job is to preserve the union’

PNG’s blind eye to K21 billion log steal

Logging_ship_Vanimo
Logging ship at Vanimo, West Sepik

EDDIE TANAGO
| ACT NOW!

PORT MOREBY - The Forest Authority must stop aiding and abetting logging companies identified by the Internal Revenue Commission as defrauding the State and landowners by evading taxes.

Fraudulent practices around log exports from PNG over the past 20 years could have the cost the country as much as K21 billion.

If logging companies are unlawfully evading taxes then the Forest Authority and the Minister must act to stop them accessing even more forest to feed their criminal activities.

Internal Revenue Commission boss Sam Koim has slammed the logging companies for “pillaging” Papua New Guinea’s forests.

He says the companies are guilty of “egregious” transfer pricing, “entrenched” tax evasion and “deceptive behaviour”.

According to Koim, logging companies are evading taxes by under-declaring their real incomes and hiding receipts in secret offshore jurisdictions.

They are also paying “very minuscule” amounts of payroll taxes, despite employing a large workforce, and are draining the government of scarce revenues by claiming large GST refunds.

The IRC says it is currently auditing 20 foreign owned logging companies and expects to be laying criminal charges, but admits there needs to be “better monitoring” of the “high-risk” sector.

For too long the Forest Authority has failed to properly monitor the logging industry and has turned a blind eye to illegal and unsustainable logging, including in areas deemed unlawful by a Commission of Inquiry.

But the new analysis from the IRC cannot be ignored, the Forest Authority must stop issuing new logging permits, extensions and renewals to these companies.

If the Authority does not act then it will be knowingly and wilfully aiding and encouraging the companies' criminal activity.

Commissioner-General Sam Koim has given the export of Kwila logs as an example of the type of transfer pricing he says logging companies are engaging in.

Koim says that when Kwila logs are exported from PNG to China, the value declared by the company might be just K400.

However the logging company is not selling logs direct to the buyer in China but to one of its own overseas subsidiaries, often registered in a secret haven.

That associated company then on-sells the logs to China for a much higher price, perhaps K1,750. The offshore company then pockets the K1,350 price difference, depriving PNG of taxes and royalties and allowing the company to constantly claim a loss on its local operations.

In 2020, 282,000 cubic metres of Kwila logs were exported from PNG, according to export monitoring company SGS.

If the logging companies were under-declaring their value by K1,350, as Koim claims, ACT NOW! has calculated the total under-declaration would have been around K400 million.

“That is K400 million potentially lost on just one species of log exports in just one year”.

Log exports from PNG over the past 20 years total some 60 million cubic metres. If the average price was being under declared by just K350 a metre, that amounts to a K21 billion fraud.

P13_png-land-grab-4The figures are eye-watering and the PNG Forest Authority cannot allow logging companies to continue to engage in fraud of such a massive scale.

ACT NOW says the government must step in and deny logging permits or permit extensions until the company involved has been given a clean bill of health by the Internal Revenue Commission.

If the Forest Authority, Board and Minister do not act, they are simply encouraging and assisting the logging companies egregious and criminal behaviour and their pillaging of our forests, as described by the IRC.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Lindsay F Bond

PNG politicians still slogging away at a 'problem'.
See: https://postcourier.com.pg/engagement-of-police-in-logging-sites-questioned/
How to get a spelling right? It is an adjective, I L L E G A L, and a crook objective.

Garrett Roche

I know of a Lae based businessman who was involved in logging, but used the timber for building and the making of furniture and provided good employment in Lae.
William Dunlop referred to an Irish priest based in Rabaul, that was probably Fr. Tim O'Neill, he was business manager for the Archdiocese of Rabaul for many years.

William Dunlop

I go back to when I was executive officer to Pius Kerepia, the secretary of Works and Supply in the early 1980s.
I was the department's representative standing in for Mr Kerepia on the Forests Industry Council for several months.

The council was ably managed by international forestry veteran Gordon Gresham, who voiced concern at the then rapid expansion of what was to become out of control logging companies.

The Archdiocese of Rabaul's business manager, Father (he was Irish; name escapes me) voiced concern that between 25 and 50 years hence, PNG would be denuded of forests with little to show for it.

In my humble opinion this would only have been possible with the collusion of politicians and the relevant departmental staffers.

William Dunlop

K63 billion shows how much the nation has been sold down the river, by the crooked recipients of a few crumbs off the rich men's tables.

What would that have done to national borrowing. There probably wouldn't be any. Government bills paid. Hospitals functioning for all. And on and on it would go.

But alas, we are doing it our way.

William Dunlop

21 billion kina gone. Before the numerous devaluations K63 billion forgone as a consequence of a few crumbs dropped from the wealthy companies' coffers into corrupt recipients greedy hands.

The ultimate recipient of the logs being Communist China.

NB. No wonder Communist China is so corpulent.

Lindsay F Bond

Contrast that with tok on "change the constitution to declare PNG a Christian country", and the forces demonstrably degrading the wealth and well-being of a nation.

Forest Authority is hardly a verifiable terminology. Flora Deplorability more like it. The insular outlook of national governance practising the customary glad-handing to foreigners for kina.

The so-termed Authority does as its told. Deplorably, it's response is less than bold.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)