Rort the system & make a few million
28 January 2022
ADELAIDE – Land administration and corruption are major and related issues in Papua New Guinea.
They are also long-term and well-recognised issues, and a source of immense hardship especially in terms of their impact on the lack of affordable housing in urban PNG.
Squatting on vacant land is not just a practice of the underclass, it is something even middle class Papua New Guineans are compelled to do because of a public policy debacle neither PNG authorities nor their Australian advisers seem able or willing to address.
Successive governments over the past 40 years have failed to deliver affordable home ownership, with the inevitable outcome that homeless people squat illegally, often for many years, before inevitably and forcibly being moved on.
Names like Bushwara, Garden Hills and Sixth Estate are amongst many others well known to Papua New Guineans as representative of a land administration system that is totally broken.
Recently the PNG media reported that residents had been given seven days to vacate land they had occupied at a tract of land at Morata 1 in Port Moresby.
In 2011, after some argy bargy, the PNG Land Board had granted Sixth Estate Limited an urban development lease for a term of five years over an area of some 51 hectares for subdivision into 654 allotments.
Sixth Estate Limited entered into what’s known as a Section 81 Agreement with the National Capital District Commission and its Physical Planning Board which required the construction of basic service infrastructure.
Well, the five years passed and not much happened apart from more squatters moving on to the land.
Then Sixth Estate, having done nothing, surrendered its lease and lo and behold the Department of Lands and Physical Planning unlawfully issued 654 state leases each for 99 years without the required service infrastructure.
The lots were duly put on the market by Sixth Estate at K80,000 a piece.
To observe that this was a wholesale abuse of proper process would be a gross understatement.
To reveal that it had been facilitated by a bureaucracy that was compliant or inept and probably both would be to reach a reasonable understanding of what had transpired.
Now, 10 years later, it seems that Sixth Estate is ready to make a move and the squatters are being given the heave-ho.
Meanwhile, with just another sad story from the naked city, Port Moresby's homeless problem intensifies.
I am just wondering how many public servants are actually living in those settlements and are forced to relocate now that forced eviction is taking place.
The Ministry of Lands and those in the lands office seem to care less, they can easily be bribed by multi corporations to bend deals and solicit land ownership at the cost of the livelihood of their own people.
It is well overdue for the government to address affordable housing for middle to low-income earnings which are slashed with huge income taxes and yet live in those settlements.
Cut the pack and privileges of politicians, and let them live in colonies with the people so they can wake up to reality. Right now, most of them are in a dream world.
On the contrary, what is the purpose of parliament enacting a vagrancy Act that cannot be implemented anyway? We need to manage urban drift at some point too.
Posted by: Reilly Kanamon | 13 October 2022 at 10:54 AM
The PNG Sun reports that the National Court has granted interim orders stopping the planned eviction of Morata settlers.
Lawyers engaged by NCD Governor Powes Parkop secured the order to stop the looming eviction by an Engan and his Chinese business partner.
Parkop said persons claiming title to land should provide alternative solutions to families made homeless.
“Our people cannot be left homeless for corporate greed or just for benefit of one title holder. Lands Department and National Land Board should ensure they don’t award title to individuals over land which already have thousands of people in occupation,” Parkop said.
Full story here:
https://pngsun.com/interim-national-court-order-stops-morata-eviction/
And a couple of questions from me:
Q.1: Have the lease terms been breached?
Q2: Is the lease unlawful as Lands didn’t follow the required S.81 statutory processes by granting a lease without the installation of required infrastructure?
Q3: If so, can a court order the Minister to revoke the lease?
Posted by: John Greenshields | 30 January 2022 at 02:00 PM
Outlandish. More massive movements, more bewildering observers.
Posted by: Lindsay F Bond | 28 January 2022 at 08:37 AM