Investigating the New Guinea Singing Dog
05 February 2022
PETER DWYER & MONICA MINNEGAL
| Queensland Museum | Edited extract
What follows is a summary introduction to a new paper on the New Guinea Singing Dog that seeks to pin down whether it is a separate species of wild animal or a close relative of the domestic dog. Peter and Monica are hot on the trail of the answer. Link here to their complete and detailed paper, ‘The provenance of diagnostic specimens of the New Guinea Singing Dog’ - KJ
BRISBANE - In 1957, the Australian Museum mammologist Ellis Troughton described two live dogs from ‘Papua’ as of a new species that he named Canis hallstromi “in honour of Sir Edward Hallstrom, President of the Taronga Park Trust”.
The dogs were held by Taronga Zoological Park (hereafter Taronga). According to Troughton they were a “pair of the mountain ‘dingo’” that had been obtained in 1956 by Assistant District Officer JP (Jim) Sinclair and Medical Assistant Albert Speer “in the remote Lavani Valley [of the] Southern Highlands District of Papua”.
Troughton considered that they were the same as ‘dingo-like’ dogs reported decades earlier from “7,000 ft. on Mount Scratchley” in the Owen Stanley Range.
Skins and skulls of Mount Scratchley dogs, held by the Queensland Museum had been described by de Vis (in 1911), Longman (1928) and WoodJones (1929).
Troughton agreed with WoodJones’ opinion that the ‘Papuan dog’ was ”a very definite race … differing widely in its characters from the dogs of certain other Pacific islands”.
In a later paper Troughton reinforced his opinion that the dog he had described was a primitive, wild-living species and insisted that use of the term ‘feral’ for this New Guinea dog was incorrect.
Troughton’s accounts of New Guinea dogs have provided historical props for assertions that a distinctive form of wild dog - variously named New Guinea Singing Dog, New Guinea Highland Wild Dog, New Guinea Dingo and, in earlier years, New Guinea Yodelling Dog - is present at scattered high altitude locations of mainland New Guinea, isolated from places where people live and, hence, largely isolated from the village dogs associated with those people.
On two counts, this opinion remains controversial.
Firstly, disagreement concerning the taxonomic status of the New Guinea Singing Dog with some authors accepting the name Canis hallstromi and others treating it, together with the Australian dingo, as Canis familiaris.
Secondly, disagreement concerning the provenance of the founding members of the captive population as wild-living or village-living, and their status as wild, feral or domestic. Koler-Matznick wrote that the “current captive singing dog population is descended from eight specimens not directly caught in the wild” and then commented that “this does not mean, however, that these specimens were village C familiaris”.
Recent genetic studies, however, using samples from the captive population, treat those dogs as descendants of wild-living forebears and, in direct contradiction to Koler-Matznick, Cairns in 2021 asserted that most of the captive New Guinea Singing Dog population was “founded by 8 individuals captured from the wild in 1950”.
Misunderstandings and misinterpretations of the historical record continue to the present time due, in part, to earlier errors and flawed assumptions being later accepted as fact.
In this paper we direct attention to errors of both fact and interpretation in accounts of the New Guinea Singing Dog with particular emphasis upon details of the provenance of specimens that were taken to be diagnostic of C.hallstromi by Troughton in 1957.
We show that the presumed status as wild animals, or as descendants from wild animals, of the founding members of the captive population of New Guinea Singing Dog is incorrect in some cases and in doubt for others.
We reinforce an earlier argument that, at the time of European colonisation of New Guinea, high-altitude wild-living dogs and most village-living dogs, as proposed by the writers in 2016, “comprised a single though heterogeneous gene pool”.
We suggest that studies of village-living dogs throughout remote areas of New Guinea offer an opportunity to learn about what was once a pan-New Guinean population of an unusual, and archaic, form of domestic dog.
___________
Audio recordings from the USA population of captive New Guinea Singing Dogs are publicly accessible through You Tube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwxV1wbBrfU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bt6-gygNcaw
We know of only one publicly available audio recording of wild-living dogs in New Guinea. This is from Puncak Jaya, Papua Province, Indonesia, in an Antiga Films documentary from 2020: 'Highland Wild Dog Story' with James 'Mac' McIntyre:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9k3yt_9aog&t=90s
We have recently completed Part I of a collation of items about dogs in New Guinea from the 1600s to the present day:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358165271
It includes quite a lot of quotes from patrol reports, PNG Attitude and Phil Fitzpatrick's book, Bamahuta: Leaving Papua.
Part II will be finished soon, and will include several embedded audio recordings of dogs from the Nomad District in Western Province.
Maybe they are just whistleblowers.
Posted by: Bernard Corden | 15 February 2022 at 10:36 AM
Peter Dwyer, - thank you. I did look up some of those links you listed, and I did listen to some of the singing dogs. And some were reminiscent of what I heard years ago in WHP. Thank you again.
Posted by: Garrett Roche | 12 February 2022 at 04:45 AM
Dogs have many characteristics but one thing that I admire most is they are obedient to their masters and can forgive you and accept apology.
I love dogs and have four or five at a time.
Some dogs sing when they see the moon at night. Others sing when they are lonely or feel sad or when they don't see their masters.
At one time I had a dog who did not sing or bark at at all. A silent or longlong dog who looked seriously at you and scared you. It Later went wild and never came back.
Posted by: Philip Kai Morre | 09 February 2022 at 09:39 PM
Garrett and others - Audio recordings from the USA population of captive New Guinea Singing Dogs are publicly accessible through You Tube, e.g.,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwxV1wbBrfU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bt6-gygNcaw
We know of only one publicly available audio recording of wild-living dogs in New Guinea.
This is from Puncak Jaya, Papua Province, Indonesia, in an Antiga Films documentary from 2020: 'Highland Wild Dog Story' with James 'Mac' McIntyre:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9k3yt_9aog&t=90s
We have recently completed Part I of a collation of items about dogs in New Guinea from the 1600s to the present day:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358165271
It includes quite a lot of quotes from patrol reports, PNG Attitude and Bamahuta.
Part II will be finished soon, and will include several embedded audio recordings of dogs from the Nomad district (Western Province).
We don’t know how to embed them here.
_______
Thanks Peter and Monica. Unfortunately the Comments section doesn't enable embeds or images. I have added these links to the end of the extract from your recent paper - KJ
Posted by: Peter Dwyer | 07 February 2022 at 08:50 PM
Paul - Our Irish border collie (Jack) reacted to my late brother Hugh when he played his fiddle by singing in tune... well, high and low notes. But not when he played the accordion.
______
We all have our limits, William - KJ
Posted by: William Dunlop | 06 February 2022 at 02:52 PM
I once owned a half New Guinea wild dog that could sing in perfect harmony with the notes on my bugle when I chose to blow it. (No negative comments please!)
The dingoes around our farm in Oz never did perform anywhere near that level of musical ability and it is well known a pure Australian dingo is never heard barking up the wrong tree.
Posted by: Paul Oates | 06 February 2022 at 09:55 AM
At Rebiamul, Mt Hagen, in the 1970's and following decades, we had several dogs - and we were not sure of their pedigree - but they could 'sing'.
They used to howl in unison in a very distinctive manner. At times it seemed almost harmonious.
If my memory is correct their singing was sometimes provoked by the ringing of church bells!
We used to associate the singing dogs especially with the Mt Giluwe area.
I did look up the complete and detailed paper, ‘The provenance of diagnostic specimens of the New Guinea Singing Dog’ - but did not see much description of the actual 'singing' these dogs were noted for.
Is there any sound recording of the 'singing' of the singing dogs?
Posted by: Garrett Roche | 06 February 2022 at 02:07 AM
I expect the New Guinea Singing Dog sounds very similar to the Subiaco Xanthippe and makes the FNQ accent almost bearable.
Posted by: Bernard Corden | 05 February 2022 at 11:09 PM