The day I met Daniel Kumbon
Pacific TB rates continue to climb

Anti-China racism as war talk stirs Oz

A Suspicion towards Chinese people has grown since the virus emerged (AFP)
Suspicion towards Chinese people has grown since the virus emerged in Wuhan (AFP)

| South China Morning Post

It's easy for some politicians to deny racism in Australia when they are not members of  targeted ethnic groups

SYDNEY – Another war is tearing through Australia’s civil society: a war of discrimination, racism and suspicion.

For three consecutive years, Australian politicians have commemorated Anzac Day, a time of remembrance of its war dead, with war-cries.

During this year’s Anzac Day, just four weeks shy of what was tipped to be a ‘khaki’ federal election, defence minister Peter Dutton marked the occasion by saying Australia can only preserve peace by preparing for war and likened Russian president Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler.

In a reference to Russia and China, prime minister Scott Morrison warned again about an ‘arc of autocracy’ – which has become one of his favourite election catchcries.

Last year, Australian home affairs secretary, Mike Pezzullo, talked about the need for “preparedness of arms” and the protection of “our precious liberty”.

The year before, Morrison was busy talking about sending weapons inspectors into the Chinese city of Wuhan – where the pandemic broke out – during investigations into the origin of the coronavirus.

This kind of fear mongering is dangerous, as it taps into a deep Australian psyche of insecurity and long-standing wariness of foreigners and ‘the others’. Who could forget the White Australia policy?

Ironically, it is regional security that Canberra often talks about along with the unfounded notion that ‘Australia is the most successful multicultural society in the world’.

Getting on a train filled with proud war veterans in Sydney this Anzac Day, I was confronted by racial abuse from an older Caucasian woman.

It started ‘innocently’ enough, first with criticism of my wearing a mask and then derisive slurs about how “my kind should move right on”.

Ordinarily and sadly, I would have moved seats. Phrases like ‘go back to where you came from’ aren’t new in Australia and many parts of the world.

ABut what she added took on a darker tinge.

She accused me and my people of storming and invading Australia and taking things. She said that I must be enjoying “breathing its fresh air”.

I called her out so that those around me would hear it, allowing it to impress their subconscious that bullying had to be stood up to.

Subconscious biases form the roots of systemic biases.

In part, this incident was as disturbing as the day Australian senator Eric Abetz used a parliamentary inquiry in 2020 to wage a ‘McCarthyist’ campaign against three Asian-Australians by demanding that they, as ‘fair dinkum’, or genuine, Australians condemn the Chinese Communist Party.

Language matters, and while most Australians do not adopt language like this, some are picking up the government’s rhetoric like kids picking up their parents’ swearing.

And it is easy for some politicians to deny racism in Australia when they themselves are not members of Asian, Muslim or other targeted ethnic groups.

The Australian government, and all governments for that matter, need to exhibit leadership and bear responsibility for civil behaviour instead of focusing on staying in power with cheap election tactics.

When politicians sacrificed the well-being of civil society for a vote, they need to think again. When they think Australians are just arbitrary toys for their personal gain, they need to think again.

If the politicians fail us as a society, and they have, we cannot let them and their greed for power get the better of us in a world becoming more geopolitically complex and challenging.

When the Morrison government wants Australian voters to believe there are invisible enemies that it can protect us from, it is the people who have to do the thinking.

Defending Australia is fair but most countries build their forts without goading and creating enemies. That is just contradictory and senseless.

We are better than that. We can reject that.

Su-Lin Tan joined the South China Morning Post in 2020 after working for the Australian Financial Review. She is a qualified accountant who, before becoming a journalist, worked in investment banking and funds management in London and Sydney


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Philip Fitzpatrick

Australia is a successful multicultural society insofar as it now has a wide range of different cultural groups and ethnicities among its population.

It is, however, an unsuccessful multicultural society because of the power imbalance between those groups and ethnicities and the old Anglo Celtic and European establishment.

You only have to look at things like television to understand this imbalance.

Contrast, for instance, the cultural and ethnic makeup of something like our early morning breakfast programs and those in other countries.

Sunrise on Channel Seven has a line-up of Anglo Celtic/European talking heads but the American version, which they screen earlier, has a mix of African Americans, Latinos, Asians, Polynesians and Europeans in their line-up.

Although it is rife with racism, America has a much more successful multicultural society than Australia by a long shot.

This may not seem like anything significant but it has the potential to be quite dangerous.

That there is danger involved is no more evident than what is happening politically in both Australia and America.

In America Trumpism and the Republican Party has created such a sharp schism between its white and ethnic populations that people are talking about it in terms of its ability to create another civil war.

In Australia our prime minister is trying to create a schism between our largely conservative and less well educated white regional areas and our more multicultural and better educated progressive suburban areas in a desperate bid to win the current election.

At the same time, as the author observes, he is ratcheting up his rhetoric about the ‘threat’ of China. He hasn’t yet resorted to describing China in terms of a ‘yellow peril’ but there’s still time for him or his defence minister to resort to such desperate terminology.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)