Pundari condemns Enga election violence
The US is sick: Time to think for ourselves

Smiles in Suva: but the map ahead is unclear

The Pacific Islands Forum was happy to welcome rookie prime minister Anthony Albanese, but his attempt to brag about Australia’s ‘influence’ in the Pacific was seen as unwanted political game-playing

Forum - Albanese (William West)
Anthony Albanese goes for the selfie money shot but the rookie Australian prime minister has a bit to learn about the practice of diplomacy

| DevPolicy Blog

BRISBANE - Last week’s meeting of leaders of the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) was keenly anticipated and came at a critical juncture for the region.

It was the first in-person meeting since Tuvalu in 2019. Since then, a lot has happened.

The impacts of Covid-19 disrupted Pacific economies and strained fragile health systems.

Increasing geostrategic competition brought enormous amounts of scrutiny to the region.

And the potential split in the Forum, triggered in February last year, is a wound that just cannot quite heal.

Fiji markets itself internationally as ‘where happiness finds you’.

PIF is headquartered in Fiji, and this was the first time since 2006, just months before now prime minister Frank Bainimarama’s coup, that the country has welcomed the Pacific leaders for a full meeting.

In the interim, Fiji was suspended (2009) and reinstated (2014) and Bainimarama declined to attend leaders’ meetings until 2019 – so this regional summit carried symbolism for the hosts in an election year.

The focus of the meeting was to launch the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent. This is an important achievement for the Forum, but in terms of external analysis it will likely be overshadowed by geopolitical concerns.

There were several new faces in the family photo, including Australia’s new prime minister Anthony Albanese.

A surprise attendee was Papua New Guinean incumbent PM James Marape, on a lightning visit during the turbulent voting period of PNG’s general election.

He handed over the chairing of the Melanesian Spearhead Group on the sidelines to Bob Loughman, prime minister of Vanuatu.

The most notable non-arrival was president Taneti Maamau of Kiribati, who announced on the eve of the meeting that his country was withdrawing from PIF.

The Republic of the Marshall Islands was absent because their administrative withdrawal was already in process, despite president David Kabua wanting to remain.

Nauru’s president Lionel Aingimea stayed away as his country is in the midst of a Covid pandemic wave, while Cook Islands PM Mark Brown couldn’t take part because of campaigning for national elections in two weeks.

Not invited to PIF this time were the 21 dialogue partners, countries with significant political or economic interest from outside the region.

This was so leaders could focus on key issues without external factors.

Both the US and China, who became dialogue partners in 1989 and 1990 respectively, were not required. But on 13 July, US vice president Kamala Harris addressed Forum leaders virtually.

Although the leaders’ retreat finished at 4pm as scheduled, the final communiqué was slow to emerge from the Secretariat.

When it arrived , the communiqué confirmed the leaders’ endorsement of the 2050 Strategy for a Blue Pacific Continent – hailed as the region’s ‘North Star’ for the future.

The strategy is the culmination of several years’ work and many consultations.

So far the response has been muted.

Until there is an implementation plan and some way of measuring its impacts it is hard to see how it can move beyond words on a page.

Leaders have tasked officials to undertake that work between now and next year’s meeting.

Leaders have also endorsed Vanuatu’s push to seek a UN resolution to request an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the human rights implications of climate change.

This was a huge win for the Vanuatu delegation, who had put lots of energy into pressing their case.

However, it meant there was no energy left to follow up a 2019 resolution calling for a visit to West Papua by the UN Commissioner for Human Rights.

With the Forum chair, PM Bainimarama, finally having spoken with president Maamau of Kiribati, the leaders endorsed the Suva Agreement, which provides for significant changes to how the secretary-general is appointed and how chairing is to be shared among the three sub-regions of Melanesia, Micronesia and Polynesia.

The connection with Maamau opens the door for further work, including through the appointment of a special envoy, to keep channels of communication open and working towards Kiribati rejoining. However, that is not likely to occur in the immediate term.

After years of Forum leaders’ meetings being poorly attended by non-regional media, this Forum had a strong Pacific media contingent, many Australians and New Zealanders as well as global players such as the BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera.

Not even Fiji’s return to democracy in 2014 saw such a media focus on Suva.

Forum meetings aren’t always easy to cover, like the last face-to-face one in tiny and remote Tuvalu (with limited space and resources) or before that in Nauru (where journalists were denied entry).

But it helps if not just the leaders show up but also the fourth estate.

Climate change is the big issue for the region, but it is the other ‘C’ word that pulled the global gaze: China.

And with the eyes of the world on the hotbed of diplomatic intrigue of Suva, the Pacific media used the occasion to highlight the repression and censorship they face.

There is no doubt that the outgoing Forum chair, the forum secretariat and others will consider this meeting a success.

Whilst that is true to an extent, there are plenty of challenges ahead.

There is a deepening fault line among the PIF membership around deep sea mining, and it is likely to become more apparent between now and when leaders next convene in Cook Islands.

Prime Minister Albanese appeared relaxed and at ease among his Pacific colleagues.

The shift in tone from the new Australian government has been welcomed by the regional leadership.

So it was disappointing that Albanese told journalists the Forum meeting has seen Australia increase its influence and that this can be expected to have “an impact”, implying that it would hopefully reduce China’s.

The PIF meeting was about forging and sustaining key relationships among its members, and seeking ways to address shared challenges and achieve shared aspirations, not geopolitical game playing.

Dr Tess Newton Cain is the Project Lead for the Pacific Hub at the Griffith Asia Institute and has been an associate of the Development Policy Centre since 2012. Stefan Armbruster is an award-winning journalist based in Brisbane. He first worked in Fiji in 1994 before moving to CNBC, Dow Jones and the BBC in London. He is currently a correspondent with SBS reporting from and on the Pacific. He also trains and mentors journalists in the Pacific region


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)