YES
What to do if your country disappears

Is this really the Australia you want

KEITH JACKSON

NOOSA - Here in Noosa, just like the rest of Australia, we’re in the middle of referendum politics, where the vitriol has reached boiling point and exceeds even the hyper-toxicity that prevails around local government elections here in Australia’s premier seaside resort apart from Tumby Bay.

My wife and debating partner Ingrid is still highly regarded in these parts after her term as a councillor (1996-2000) when, much to the liking of a large number of citizens, she took on the mayor and five other councillors in a campaign to make the council more transparent, more accountable and better governed.

I got a lawyer on board early and Ingrid had considerable success in beating off 10 official complaints and much freelance smearing. There were three years of mayhem which saw the mayor subsequently lose his bid for re-election and three women taking Ingrid’s place when she reckoned one term was enough.

Ingrid now writes opinion columns for the local newspaper and pumps out a running commentary on current affairs in her Facebook site, Noosa By Design, that focuses on national and local issues from a moderate, progressive mindset.

Unfortunately these admirable traits do not rub off on some readers, who have taken the opportunity of the referendum to make it a vote on, not about, Aboriginal people. The No campaign has developed as something of a licensing body to slander Australia’s Indigenous population. You may not give a stuff, but I call it racism.

Here - from Noosa resident Carl Beck – is the sort of thing I have to put up with (fair-minded bastard that I am, I corrected his spelling and straightened out the grammar):

“I just love the term truth telling! There is nothing truthful about The Voice. If successful it is only a start. Next will be treaty, and then reconciliation, and then sovereignty. It’s not about love and what’s right. It’s about power and money!

“Of the 800,000 or so Aboriginal people only 0.03% are full blood. That is approximately 40,000. The rest have another side to them but never recognise it because it suits them not to. [There’s] no money in the white side of things!

“Living in the past achieves nothing. Holding people to account for something they had nothing to do with is just a stupid way of looking at things. Saying they have no voice now is a lie. Saying they have no hope for the future is a lie.

“Plenty of Aboriginal people have made significant contributions to Australia. Why? Because they got off their arse and worked for it the same way every white person has to!

“Dividing the country by race is a very dangerous move and will only bring more grief and still no good outcomes.”

To which I commented, “Written with all the passion of a real racist.”

But I have some facts too:

From the linked list of about 123 Indigenous languages you can derive a sense of the extent of culture, complexity and belief of Indigenous Australians, as well as an admiration for how in hell they’ve survived for over two centuries of being trespassed upon, stolen from and intimidated by settlers, pastoralists, missionaries, police, do-gooders and modern day racists.

There are (in 2023) 984,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia, representing 3.8% of the population.

Evidence of Aboriginal descent is through self-identification and community recognition of people who wish to identify as Indigenous. This is strengthened by evidence of a family history or tradition of Aboriginal descent, which can be passed on orally.

Approximately 50% of Indigenous adults are reliant on some form of welfare payment; for young people (15 - 24) the proportion is slightly lower.

The notion of the pure blood Aboriginal is about as meaningful as the pure blood Englishman. The people with a direct link to 50,000 years ago number about 5,000. That is they are almost extinct. 

Nevertheless, Australia’s Indigenous people – of whatever inheritance - represent a distinct, undervalued and disrespected group within our society. Attitudes to them and their modest aspirations are a disgrace.

That 60% of Australians should be lining them up for another kick in the guts is a disgrace.

As if the colonists, missionaries, pastoralists and the countless others who collectively ripped them off and tried to rip out their spirit weren’t enough, there’s now another bunch of whiners trying to deny them a line in the Constitution and a committee.

And I conclude with a note for our Papua New Guinean and other overseas readers, is this the kind of country you thought Australia was?

Hmmm, I thought you might.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Lindsay F Bond

Earlier, folk thought they could count on power in numbers, yet today we are to understand shortfall.

That is, shortfall of process, of perspective, of participation, of cultural patrimony, of paragraphs on paper.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-09-28/fact-check-geoffrey-blainey-indigenous-counted-census-1967/102906950

Can we count on equity in humanity? Democratic device of any numerical percentage that holds sway ignores normative practice of attendance to folk in perilous circumstance.

As to any 50% + 1 of voters deciding on this matter termed 'Voice', when will it be that any majority percentage of Australians will fully embrace all minority percentages of Australians, so sharing ordinarily and reliably, not only at 'emergency' circumstance?
_______

To succeed, the referendum requires a majority of votes in a majority of States, deeming that anything less than four States in favour will negate the referendum question.

Two polls this week show the Yes vote at 33% (Freshwater, Financial Review) and 36% (Newspoll, The Australian). Albanese's favourability is tumbling at the same time.

So it does seem that Australia's Indigenous people, first marginalised by British colonial rulers and unnentioned in the 1901 Constitution, are set to remain populi nullius - KJ

Bernard Corden

Q: What's the difference between an Australian wedding and an Australian funeral?

A: There is one less drunk at the funeral.

Philip Fitzpatrick

Interesting take on The Voice. The last few paragraphs give some interesting clues to what happens if it fails.

https://theconversation.com/why-the-voice-could-be-a-bulwark-against-trumpism-gaining-a-stronger-foothold-in-australia-213856

William Dunlop

Ach nou, Keith, I much enjoyed Ingrid's sojourn as a Noosa Councillor which I followed diligently on Facebook, as a fly on the wall, you might say.

I wasn't quite sure if some of the Councillors shouldn't have been classified as Imitation Cowboys or just plain Ejits. Mind you, when I look at the Northern Territory, I find they are not on their lonesome. Slantie Wm.

William Dunlop

I am in complete agreement, Keith. However this referendum has been poorly handled by the respective bodies politic.

Division, us, them, we know what's best, etc, etc.

Slantie Wm
________

And on that we do agree, my old Irish rover - KJ

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)