A voice always worth listening to....
Recent Notes 41: Board games for sad boys

Social media blackout hurts the good guys

MATHIAS KIN & KEITH JACKSON

Peter
Peter Tsiamalili Jr is a smart guy, but the police minister needs to avoid sweeping government decisions that throw out the babies with the bathwater.  

MATHIAS REPORTS....

Mathias & Ingrid
Mathias Kin and Ingrid Jackson on the road to Gembogl many moons ago

KUNDIAWA – I know that people in Australia have been watching closely the recent political developments in Papua New Guinea. In recent years, there have been numerous threats by the government to ban Facebook and other social media sites.

Then yesterday, when our Facebook accounts appeared on our phones and tablets, they gave this message, "Please check your internet connection and try again.”  Since then, Facebook accounts across the country have not been working.

There is also message being tossed around that WhatsApp will be next to go.

Even our educational and very busy Chimbu History page is affected. It is a great sadness that I cannot access it now.

So, my friends in Australia and elsewhere, this message from me i.s to alert you about these developments.

KEITH COMMENTS….

-KJ dec 2024
Keith Jackson: "The government's action was over-reach to deal with longlong man blo ol haus pik who pollute the internet with hate speech"

NOOSA - PNG government sources were today bragging that they had “successfully tested technology to block social media platforms, particularly Facebook” for much of Monday.

The police minister Peter Tsiamalili Jr said the so-called test was undertaken within the context of the Anti-Terrorism Act passed by parliament just last year.

It seemed to be over-reach to deal with those longlong man blo ol haus pik who pollute the internet with hate speech, misinformation and other harmful content. And I place the US president in this category of offender.  Musk too.

Is the PNG government ready to deal with the guys who run America now thinking that PNG’s leaders are ‘woke’?

"We are not attempting to suppress free speech or restrict our citizens from expressing their viewpoints," police minister Peter Tsiamalili said.

Sounds like it to me.

So, in trying to rid the internet of its worst elements, Pete and his wantoks have got rid of its best people -  folks like Peter Kranz in Australia and Mathias up there in the misty mountains.

Surely they didn’t have to cut down the tree because of a rotten branch?

The wild axe-swinging measures took PNG’s technocrats by surprise.

“Public confidence in our digital governance relies on transparency and consistency in how we approach online regulation,” said a Kilakupa Gulo-Vui, CEO of the National Information and Communications Technology Authority.

“It’s essential that NICTA, law enforcement, telecommunications providers and government agencies collaborate closely to ensure action is well-understood and properly executed.

“While maintaining national security is a priority, the balance between safety and digital freedom must be carefully managed.”

Mr Gulo-Vui is a wise man and should be consulted before such heavy-handed behaviour is contemplated in future.

The problem of idiots online needs to be solved not displaced. Within a few hours of Facebook disappearing from government controlled infrastructure, the smart guys had estabishedl virtual local area networks, a system that groups devices into the same physical network

Meanwhile, East Sepik governor Allan Bird said this afternoon that the Marape government “"is heading into dangerous territory and everyone is powerless to stop this tyranny.”

Bird said the country's anti-terrorism law could target anyone because "the definition of a terrorist is left to the Police Minister to decide.

“During the debate on the anti-terrorism bill in parliament, I pointed out that the law was too broad and it could be used against innocent people," he said.

"There is no limit to the powers the police minister can exercise under this new law. It is a draconian law designed to take away our freedoms.”

Grass roots citizens were also saying the government has done the wrong thing. “Where is PNG headed?” Lucas Kiap asked. “If the government continues down this path, it risks trading democracy for control.

“In combating hate speech and exploitation, the approach risks paving way for authoritarian overreach.”

It certainly does. Athough the next national election is not due until 2027, there is every good reason why .

With the much deferred local government elections now scheduled for June and the issue of Bougainville independence beginning to bubble over, there are plenty of reasons why Marape and his offsiders would want to control social media in the weeks and months ahead.

And anyway, we want our Chimbu History page back.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bernard Corden

" Freedom is the right to tell other people what they do not want to hear " - George Orwell

Lindsay F Bond

A method engaged elsewhere is coincidental to matters arising in Papua New Guinea.

"Türkiye experienced widespread access issues on major social media platforms."

https://www.turkiyetoday.com/turkiye/social-media-access-restricted-in-turkiye-amid-political-developments-133004

A disquiet about national leadership (as of Türkiye) seems curiously current with a parameter of leadership in PNG.

https://www.thenational.com.pg/kua-testifies/

Hope ought be in effective equity in governance rather than 'windfall' enrichment of extraneous media platforms.

Michael Dom

A constitutional democracy is already under control. No one in their right mind should desire a full democracy, i.e., majority rule.

What would happen to the 105 or TNT in Port Moresby, for instance, should the rest of the population decide that they were too unruly to stay.

The national constitution was written to delineate the functions of government and limit the power of the state from impinging on the rights of its citizens.

The government sets laws which ensure that the citizens do not impinge on each others rights.

By accepting the constitution we accept the responsibility to uphold each others rights and by extension limit the power of the state from doing so.

Allowing so called hate speech is necessary for the health of the nation and not the state.

What'smore, the term hate speech is intrinsically authoritarian because it relies on whomever is in power to define what entails hate speech and consequently enforce punishment on the transgressors, ibid, so accepting the use of that trumped up terminology is tantamount to accepting restriction to liberty.

Free speech includes hateful words. That is our right. It is our responsibility to use our speech with good intentions, but everyone knows that that doesn't always work out like we plan.

When the king is naked someone must say so or else we shall all look foolish.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)